Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28814649›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2017

Wnt ligand presentation and reception: from the stem cell niche to tissue engineering.

Kate M Mills, James L A Szczerkowski, Shukry J Habib

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Specialized cytonemes induce self-organization of stem cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kate M MillsCentre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
James L A SzczerkowskiCentre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Shukry J HabibCentre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK shukry.habib@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3132-2216
Google (United States) · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K017047/1Medical Research Council MR/K026666/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cells reside in niches where spatially restricted signals maintain a delicate balance between stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Wnt family proteins are particularly suited for this role as they are modified by lipids, which constrain and spatially regulate their signalling range. In recent years, Wnt/β-catenin signalling has been shown to be essential for the self-renewal of a variety of mammalian stem cells. In this review, we discuss Wnt-responsive stem cells in their niche, and mechanisms by which Wnt ligands are presented to responsive cells. We also highlight recent progress in molecular visualization that has allowed for the monitoring of Wnt signalling within the stem cell compartment and new approaches to recapitulate this niche signalling

Indexed as

Wnt Signaling PathwayAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationHumansLigandsStem Cell NicheStem CellsTissue EngineeringLigandsadult and embryonic stem cellscell therapy and regenerative medicineprotein immobilizationstem cell nichetissue engineeringWnt signalling

Identifiers

PMID28814649
PMCPMC5577451
OpenAlexW2748193302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.