Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28814644›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2017

Subgenome Dominance in an Interspecific Hybrid, Synthetic Allopolyploid, and a 140-Year-Old Naturally Established Neo-Allopolyploid Monkeyflower.

Patrick P Edger, Ronald Smith, Michael R McKain, Arielle M Cooley, Mario Vallejo-Marin, Yaowu Yuan, Adam J Bewick, Lexiang Ji, Adrian E Platts, Megan J Bowman and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Patrick P EdgerDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6836-3041
Ronald SmithDepartment of Applied Science, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2736-0092
Michael R McKainDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63132.
Arielle M CooleyBiology Department, Whitman College, Walla Walla, Washington 99362.
Mario Vallejo-MarinBiological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5663-8025
Yaowu YuanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1376-0028
Adam J BewickDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
Lexiang JiInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
Adrian E PlattsMcGill Centre for Bioinformatics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0E9, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-9647
Megan J BowmanDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Kevin L ChildsDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3680-062X
Jacob D WashburnDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0185-7105
Robert J SchmitzDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
Gregory D SmithDepartment of Applied Science, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1054-6790
J Chris PiresDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9682-2639
Joshua R PuzeyDepartment of Biology, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185 jrpuzey@wm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8019-9993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that one of the parental subgenomes in ancient polyploids is generally more dominant, having retained more genes and being more highly expressed, a phenomenon termed subgenome dominance. The genomic features that determine how quickly and which subgenome dominates within a newly formed polyploid remain poorly understood. To investigate the rate of emergence of subgenome dominance, we examined gene expression, gene methylation, and transposable element (TE) methylation in a natural, <140-year-old allopolyploid (

Indexed as

Genome, PlantHybridization, GeneticPolyploidyDNA MethylationGene DuplicationGene Expression Regulation, PlantMimulusPhylogenySpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID28814644
PMCPMC5635986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.