Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28814612›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2017

Effects of a social cue on reproductive development and pre-alternate molt in seasonally breeding migrant and resident female songbirds (

Helen E Chmura, Simone L Meddle, John C Wingfield, Thomas P Hahn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen E ChmuraDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA hechmura@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6626-8534
Simone L MeddleThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The Roslin Institute Building, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
John C WingfieldDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Thomas P HahnDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · USRoslin Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004316/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004332/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013759/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To time reproduction optimally, birds have evolved diverse mechanisms by which they respond to environmental changes that help them anticipate and prepare for the breeding season. While residents initiate reproductive preparation and breed in the same geographic location, migrant birds simultaneously prepare for breeding and migration far from their breeding grounds. As a result, it is hypothesized that migrant and resident birds use environmental cues differently to prepare to breed and that there is adaptive specialization in mechanisms regulating reproductive preparation. Specifically, residents are expected to rely more on non-photic cues (e.g. food, temperature, social cues) than migrants. We tested this general prediction using a social cue manipulation. First, we compared the effects of subspecies-appropriate recorded male song on reproductive development in migrants and residents on a naturally increasing photoperiod. Second, we tested the sensitivity of migrant-specific life history events (fattening and pre-alternate molt) to song treatment. After 82 days, residents had higher luteinizing hormone and greater ovarian development than migrants, but song treatment had no effect on these metrics in either subspecies. Song advanced pre-alternate molt but had no effect on fattening in migrants. While our study does not support specialization in social cue use in migrants and residents, it is consistent with findings in the literature of specialization in photoperiodic response. It also demonstrates for the first time that social cues can influence molt in a migrant species. Additional findings from a pilot study looking at responses to a live male suggest it is important to test other kinds of social cues.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationCuesLife History TraitsReproductionAdipose TissueAnimal MigrationAnimalsCaliforniaFemaleLuteinizing HormoneMoltingOvarySongbirdsLuteinizing HormoneAvianMigrationPhenologyReproductionSeasonal timingSong

Identifiers

PMID28814612
PMCPMC5576066
OpenAlexW2747786778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.