Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28814570›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2017

EB1 and EB3 regulate microtubule minus end organization and Golgi morphology.

Chao Yang, Jingchao Wu, Cecilia de Heus, Ilya Grigoriev, Nalan Liv, Yao Yao, Ihor Smal, Erik Meijering, Judith Klumperman, Robert Z Qi and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role ofCirculation research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Phase separation of +TIP networks regulates microtubule dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chao YangCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jingchao WuCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2958-3751
Cecilia de HeusDepartment of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8618-8451
Ilya GrigorievCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1534-0430
Nalan LivDepartment of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Yao YaoDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9671-3248
Ihor SmalDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7576-7028
Erik MeijeringDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Judith KlumpermanDepartment of Cell Biology, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Robert Z QiDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Anna AkhmanovaCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands a.akhmanova@uu.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9048-8614
Utrecht University · NLErasmus MC · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLHong Kong University of Science and Technology · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-binding proteins (EBs) are the core components of microtubule plus end tracking protein complexes, but it is currently unknown whether they are essential for mammalian microtubule organization. Here, by using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout technology, we generated stable cell lines lacking EB2 and EB3 and the C-terminal partner-binding half of EB1. These cell lines show only mild defects in cell division and microtubule polymerization. However, the length of CAMSAP2-decorated stretches at noncentrosomal microtubule minus ends in these cells is reduced, microtubules are detached from Golgi membranes, and the Golgi complex is more compact. Coorganization of microtubules and Golgi membranes depends on the EB1/EB3-myomegalin complex, which acts as membrane-microtubule tether and counteracts tight clustering of individual Golgi stacks. Disruption of EB1 and EB3 also perturbs cell migration, polarity, and the distribution of focal adhesions. EB1 and EB3 thus affect multiple interphase processes and have a major impact on microtubule minus end organization.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell MovementCell PolarityCytoskeletal ProteinsFocal AdhesionsGolgi ApparatusHeLa CellsHumansInterphaseIntracellular MembranesMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesMuscle ProteinsNuclear ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCytoskeletal ProteinsMAPRE1 protein, humanMAPRE3 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMuscle ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPDE4DIP protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28814570
PMCPMC5626540
OpenAlexW2747434687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.