Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28814469›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2017

Characterization of the amplificatory effect of norepinephrine in the acquisition of Pavlovian threat associations.

Lorenzo Díaz-Mataix, Walter T Piper, Hillary C Schiff, Clark H Roberts, Vincent D Campese, Robert M Sears, Joseph E LeDoux

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Analysis of memory modulation by conditioned stimuli.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Noradrenergic Modulation of Fear Conditioning and Extinction.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lorenzo Díaz-MataixCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6766-9479
Walter T PiperCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Hillary C SchiffCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1147-2399
Clark H RobertsCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Vincent D CampeseCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Robert M SearsCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Joseph E LeDouxCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · USNew York University · USState University of New York · US

Funding

SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION IN FEAR CONDITIONING CIRCUITSR01MH046516 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI LEDOUX, JOSEPH E · 1991 to 2015
$5.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH046516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The creation of auditory threat Pavlovian memory requires an initial learning stage in which a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS), such as a tone, is paired with an aversive one (US), such as a shock. In this phase, the CS acquires the capacity of predicting the occurrence of the US and therefore elicits conditioned defense responses. Norepinephrine (NE), through β-adrenergic receptors in the amygdala, enhances threat memory by facilitating the acquisition of the CS-US association, but the nature of this effect has not been described. Here we show that NE release, induced by the footshock of the first conditioning trial, promotes the subsequent enhancement of learning. Consequently, blocking NE transmission disrupts multitrial but not one-trial conditioning. We further found that increasing the time between the conditioning trials eliminates the amplificatory effect of NE. Similarly, an unsignaled footshock delivered in a separate context immediately before conditioning can enhance learning. These results help define the conditions under which NE should and should not be expected to alter threat processing and fill an important gap in the understanding of the neural processes relevant to the pathophysiology of stress and anxiety disorders.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAmygdalaAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalElectroshockExtinction, PsychologicalFearFreezing Reaction, CatalepticMaleMemory, Long-TermNorepinephrinePropranololRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTime FactorsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsNorepinephrinePropranolol

Identifiers

PMID28814469
PMCPMC5580522
OpenAlexW2748042085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.