Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28814336›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2017

Risk behaviour determinants among people who inject drugs in Stockholm, Sweden over a 10-year period, from 2002 to 2012.

Niklas Karlsson, Michele Santacatterina, Kerstin Käll, Maria Hägerstrand, Susanne Wallin, Torsten Berglund, Anna Mia Ekström

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02234167 (Svenska Häktesprogrammet, Prevention, Risk Behaviour and Infectious Diseases Among IDU.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02234167 nacompletednot on this map

Svenska Häktesprogrammet, Prevention, Risk Behaviour and Infectious Diseases Among IDU.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2002 to 2013ConditionsHaving Ever Injected DrugsArmsRisk behaviour and infectious diseases
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Niklas KarlssonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. niklas.karlsson@folkhalsomyndigheten.se.ORCID 0000-0003-0523-5397
Michele SantacatterinaUnit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kerstin KällDependency Clinic, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria HägerstrandSwedish Prison and Probation Service, Norrköping, Sweden.
Susanne WallinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Torsten BerglundDepartment of Monitoring and Evaluation, Public Health Agency of Sweden, 171 82, Solna, Sweden.
Anna Mia EkströmDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEPublic Health Agency of Sweden · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SELinköping University Hospital · SESwedish Prison and Probation Service · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople who inject drugs (PWID) frequently engage in injection risk behaviours exposing them to blood-borne infections. Understanding the underlying causes that drive various types and levels of risk behaviours is important to better target preventive interventions.

methodsA total of 2150 PWID in Swedish remand prisons were interviewed between 2002 and 2012. Questions on socio-demographic and drug-related variables were asked in relation to the following outcomes: Having shared injection drug solution and having lent out or having received already used drug injection equipment within a 12 month recall period.

resultsWomen shared solutions more than men (odds ratio (OR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03; 2.21). Those who had begun to inject drugs before age 17 had a higher risk (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.99; 2.08) of having received used equipment compared to 17-19 year olds. Amphetamine-injectors shared solutions more than those injecting heroin (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.64; 3.62). A housing contract lowered the risk of unsafe injection by 37-59% compared to being homeless.

conclusionsWomen, early drug debut, amphetamine users and homeless people had a significantly higher level of injection risk behaviour and need special attention and tailored prevention to successfully combat hepatitis C and HIV transmission among PWID.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT02234167.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAge of OnsetAmphetamine-Related DisordersDrug UsersFemaleHepatitis CHeroin DependenceHIV InfectionsHumansIll-Housed PersonsMaleNeedle SharingPrisonsDeterminantsHepatitis CHIVInjection risk behaviourPeople who inject drugs

Identifiers

PMID28814336
PMCPMC5559856
OpenAlexW2747673226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.