Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28814289›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2017

Cohort study on living arrangements of older men and women and risk for basic activities of daily living disability: findings from the AGES project.

Tami Saito, Chiyoe Murata, Jun Aida, Katsunori Kondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association Between Types of Loneliness and Risks of Functional Disability in Older Men and Women: A Prospective Analysis.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Risk Factors of Long-Term Care Insurance Certification in Japan: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tami SaitoDepartment of Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan. t-saito@ncgg.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-9056-3522
Chiyoe MurataDepartment of Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan.
Jun AidaDepartment of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Katsunori KondoCenter for Preventive Medical Science, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiving arrangements of older adults have changed worldwide with increasing solitary and non-spouse households, which could affect social care systems. However, the relationship between these households and disability onset has remained unclear. We examined the relationship between living arrangements and the onset of basic activities of daily living disability in older adults, with a focus on gender differences and cohabitation status of those without a spouse.

methodsData from 6600 men and 6868 women aged 65 years or older without disability were obtained from the Aichi Gerontological Evaluation Study Project in Japan. Onset of disability was followed for 9.4 years. Disability was assessed based on Long-term Care Insurance System registration. A hierarchical Cox proportional hazards model was conducted to examine the risk of living alone and living only with non-spousal cohabitants compared to those living with spouses.

resultsMen living only with non-spousal cohabitants and those living alone were significantly more likely to develop disability after controlling for health and other covariates (hazard ratio = 1.38 and 1.45, respectively), while a significant difference was found only for women living alone (hazard ratio = 1.19). The risk of living with non-spousal cohabitants was marginally stronger in men, indicated by the interaction effect model (p = .08). A series of hierarchical analyses showed that social support exchange explained 24.4% and 15.8% of the excess risk of disability onset in men living alone and those living only with non-spousal cohabitants, respectively. A subsequent analysis also showed that support provision by older adults more greatly explained such excess risk than receiving support from others.

conclusionsOlder men without spouses were more likely to develop disability onset regardless of cohabitants. Health professionals should consider programs that enhance social support exchange, particularly support provision by older adults who are at risk of disability.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingFamily CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsAgedAge of OnsetCohort StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansInsurance, Long-Term CareJapanMaleNeeds AssessmentPersons with DisabilitiesProportional Hazards ModelsRisk AssessmentBasic activities of daily livingJapaneseLiving arrangementsLongitudinal study

Identifiers

PMID28814289
PMCPMC5559833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.