Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28813655›Full record

ArticleImmunity2017

Making It Personal: Neoantigen Vaccines in Metastatic Melanoma.

Matthew D Hellmann, Alexandra Snyder

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The future of cancer immunotherapy: DNA vaccines leading the way.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Immunotherapy of Melanoma: Facts and Hopes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Review
  15. Cancer DNA vaccines: current preclinical and clinical developments and future perspectives.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew D HellmannDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10028, USA. Electronic address: hellmanm@mskcc.org.
Alexandra SnyderDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10028, USA; Adaptive Biotechnologies, 1551 Eastlake Ave. E, Ste 200, Seattle, WA 98102, USA. Electronic address: snyderca@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic mutations in cancer can be translated into peptides, termed neoantigens, which can be recognized by the immune system as "foreign" epitopes. Two recent studies in Nature (Sahin et al., 2017; Ott et al., 2017) examine the effects of neoantigen vaccines on patients with stage III or IV melanoma and demonstrate immunogenicity and intriguing clinical safety and efficacy data in phase I studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmAutoantigensCancer VaccinesClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicHumansImmunotherapyMelanomaMutationNeoplasm MetastasisSkin NeoplasmsVaccines, SubunitAntigens, NeoplasmAutoantigensCancer VaccinesVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID28813655
OpenAlexW2749646208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.