Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28813499›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Staphylococcus aureus biofilm elicits the expansion, activation and polarization of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in vivo and in vitro.

Kuo-Ti Peng, Ching-Chuan Hsieh, Tsung-Yu Huang, Pei-Chun Chen, Hsin-Nung Shih, Mel S Lee, Pey-Jium Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The evolving landscape ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kuo-Ti PengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Ching-Chuan HsiehDepartment of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Tsung-Yu HuangDivision of Infection Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Pei-Chun ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Hsin-Nung ShihDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Mel S LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Pey-Jium ChangGraduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-0346
Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most common causes of biofilm infections in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Accumulating evidence has shown that the immunosuppressive environment established by S. aureus biofilm infection in PJIs involves the presence of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and M2-macrophages. Due to the diversity of MDSCs, little is known about whether S. aureus biofilm preferentially expands specific MDSC subsets or whether MDSCs can further differentiate into M2-macrophages during S. aureus biofilm infection. Here, we show that in agreement with the results from an established rat PJI model, S. aureus biofilm cocultured with freshly isolated bone marrow cells (BMCs) in vitro significantly increases the proportions of MDSCs, total macrophages and M2-macrophages. Interestingly, we find that treatment of the BMCs in vitro with S. aureus biofilm preferentially promotes the expansion of monocytic MDSCs but not granulocytic MDSCs. Biofilm treatment also substantially enhances the overall MDSC immunosuppressive activity in addition to the MDSC expansion in vitro. Importantly, we provide evidence that S. aureus biofilm is capable of further stimulating the conversion of monocytic MDSCs into M2-macrophages in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, our studies reveal a direct link between MDSCs and M2-macrophages occurring in S. aureus-associated PJIs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiofilmsCells, CulturedFlow CytometryMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMyeloid CellsRatsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionStaphylococcus aureusT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocytes, Regulatory

Identifiers

PMID28813499
PMCPMC5559065
OpenAlexW2749600102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.