ArticlePloS one2017
Mechanisms for pattern specificity of deep-brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing deep brain stimulation based on isostable amplitude in essential tremor patient models.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- Phase-dependence of response curves to deep brain stimulation and their relationship: from essential tremor patient data to a Wilson-Cowan model.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a widely used technique for treating advanced stages of neurological and psychiatric illness. In the case of motor disorders related to basal ganglia (BG) dysfunction, several mechanisms of action for the DBS therapy have been identified which might be involved simultaneously or in sequence. However, the identification of a common key mechanism underlying the clinical relevant DBS configurations has remained elusive due to the inherent complexity related to the interaction between the electrical stimulation and the neural tissue, and the intricate circuital structure of the BG-thalamocortical network. In this work, it is shown that the clinically relevant range for both, the frequency and intensity of the electrical stimulation pattern, is an emergent property of the BG anatomy at the system-level that can be addressed using mean-field descriptive models of the BG network. Moreover, it is shown that the activity resetting mechanism elicited by electrical stimulation provides a natural explanation to the ineffectiveness of irregular (i.e., aperiodic) stimulation patterns, which has been commonly observed in previously reported pathophysiology models of Parkinson's disease. Using analytical and numerical techniques, these results have been reproduced in both cases: 1) a reduced mean-field model that can be thought as an elementary building block capable to capture the underlying fundamentals of the relevant loops constituting the BG-thalamocortical network, and 2) a detailed model constituted by the direct and hyperdirect loops including one-dimensional spatial structure of the BG nuclei. We found that the optimal ranges for the essential parameters of the stimulation patterns can be understood without taking into account biophysical details of the relevant structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.