Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28813432›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Basic reversal-learning capacity in flies suggests rudiments of complex cognition.

Brad R Foley, Paul Marjoram, Sergey V Nuzhdin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brad R FoleyDepartment of Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4543-0648
Paul MarjoramDepartment of Preventative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Sergey V NuzhdinDepartment of Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Funding

Drosophila Societies: Agent-Based Analysis of Behavioral Plasticity and GeneticsR01MH100879 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MARJORAM, PAUL, NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most basic models of learning are reinforcement learning models (for instance, classical and operant conditioning) that posit a constant learning rate; however many animals change their learning rates with experience. This process is sometimes studied by reversing an existing association between cues and rewards, and measuring the rate of relearning. Augmented reversal-learning, where learning rates increase with practice, can be an important component of behavioral flexibility; and may provide insight into higher cognition. Previous studies of reversal-learning in Drosophila have not measured learning rates, but have tended to focus on measuring gross deficits in reversal-learning, as the ratio of two timepoints. These studies have uncovered a diversity of mechanisms underlying reversal-learning, but natural genetic variation in this trait has yet to be assessed. We conducted a reversal-learning regime on a diverse panel of Drosophila melanogaster genotypes. We found highly significant genetic variation in their baseline ability to learn. We also found that they have a consistent, and strong (1.3×), increase in their learning speed with reversal. We found no evidence, however, that there was genetic variation in their ability to increase their learning rates with experience. This may suggest that Drosophila have a hitherto unrecognized ability to integrate acquired information, and improve their decision making; but that their mechanisms for doing so are under strong constraints.

Indexed as

CognitionDrosophilaReversal LearningAlgorithmsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterGenotypeModels, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID28813432
PMCPMC5558953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.