Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28813413›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Polylox barcoding reveals haematopoietic stem cell fates realized in vivo.

Weike Pei, Thorsten B Feyerabend, Jens Rössler, Xi Wang, Daniel Postrach, Katrin Busch, Immanuel Rode, Kay Klapproth, Nikolaus Dietlein, Claudia Quedenau and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 249 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
249citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

249 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Clonal dynamics deviate from neutral drift in zebrafish spermatogenesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Lineage tracing of both quiescent G0 and active Hoxb5+ LT-HSCs that actively contribute to homeostatic mouse hematopoiesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Weike PeiDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Thorsten B FeyerabendDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jens RösslerDivision of Theoretical Systems Biology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Xi WangDivision of Theoretical Systems Biology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel PostrachDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin BuschDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Immanuel RodeDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Kay KlapprothDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Nikolaus DietleinDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Claudia QuedenauMax Delbrück Center, Scientific Genomics Platforms (BIMSB/BIH), D-13125 Berlin, Germany.
Wei ChenMax Delbrück Center, Scientific Genomics Platforms (BIMSB/BIH), D-13125 Berlin, Germany.
Sascha SauerMax Delbrück Center, Scientific Genomics Platforms (BIMSB/BIH), D-13125 Berlin, Germany.
Stephan WolfGenomics &Proteomics Core Facilities, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas HöferDivision of Theoretical Systems Biology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans-Reimer RodewaldDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

European Research Council 742883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental deconvolution of complex organs and tissues at the level of individual cells remains challenging. Non-invasive genetic fate mapping has been widely used, but the low number of distinct fluorescent marker proteins limits its resolution. Much higher numbers of cell markers have been generated using viral integration sites, viral barcodes, and strategies based on transposons and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing; however, temporal and tissue-specific induction of barcodes in situ has not been achieved. Here we report the development of an artificial DNA recombination locus (termed Polylox) that enables broadly applicable endogenous barcoding based on the Cre-loxP recombination system. Polylox recombination in situ reaches a practical diversity of several hundred thousand barcodes, allowing tagging of single cells. We have used this experimental system, combined with fate mapping, to assess haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) fates in vivo. Classical models of haematopoietic lineage specification assume a tree with few major branches. More recently, driven in part by the development of more efficient single-cell assays and improved transplantation efficiencies, different models have been proposed, in which unilineage priming may occur in mice and humans at the level of HSCs. We have introduced barcodes into HSC progenitors in embryonic mice, and found that the adult HSC compartment is a mosaic of embryo-derived HSC clones, some of which are unexpectedly large. Most HSC clones gave rise to multilineage or oligolineage fates, arguing against unilineage priming, and suggesting coherent usage of the potential of cells in a clone. The spreading of barcodes, both after induction in embryos and in adult mice, revealed a basic split between common myeloid-erythroid development and common lymphocyte development, supporting the long-held but contested view of a tree-like haematopoietic structure.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttachment Sites, MicrobiologicalCell LineageCell TrackingClone CellsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEmbryo, MammalianErythroid CellsFemaleHematopoietic Stem CellsIntegrasesLymphocytesMaleMiceMosaicismMyeloid CellsCre recombinaseIntegrases

Identifiers

PMID28813413
PMCPMC5905670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.