Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2017
Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 97 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CSP #517-FS - ROOBY Trial Extension (Randomized on Pump and Off Pump Bypass Surgery: Long Term Follow-up)
On-pump Versus Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting , Short Term Outcomes , Sohag Experience
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Guideline
- Coronary artery bypass surgery for acute coronary syndrome: A network meta-analysis of on-pump cardioplegic arrest, off-pump, and on-pump beating heart strategies.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2022Pooled it
- A Meta-Analysis of Early, Mid-term and Long-Term Mortality of On-Pump vs. Off-Pump in Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Prevalence and Impact of Treatment Crossover in Cardiac Surgery Randomized Trials: A Meta-Epidemiologic Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Pooled it
- Off- Versus On-Pump Coronary Surgery and the Effect of Follow-Up Length and Surgeons' Experience: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Pooled it
- Expertise-based design in surgical trials: a narrative review.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgiePooled it
- Early and mid-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Trial
- 15-year outcomes of the JOCRI study (JOCRIED study): a randomised comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularisation.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Trial
- Impact of early quantitative morbidity on 1-year outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Trial
- Outcomes of On- Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Acute and Subacute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The 20-year long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting: An off-pump first approach.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- OPCAB in the minimally invasive era: impact on wound complications-a comparative study with on-pump CABG.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Combining Surgical and Percutaneous Revascularization for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025Article
- Life after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Lifestyle Changes, Secondary Prevention, and Quality of Life.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2025Review
- Propensity-matched analysis of the impact of saphenous vein graft external stenting on clinical outcomes in coronary bypass surgery: The RESTART study.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Remains the Cornerstone: Reflections on the Future of Coronary Revascularization.Journal of chest surgery · 2025Article
- Body Surface Area-Weighted Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Enhances Prediction Accuracy of OPCABG Outcomes: A Large Multi-Center Cohort Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experiences of Perfusionists on the Safety of Cardiopulmonary Perfusion.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: long-term outcomes.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- The Past, Present, and Future of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Journal of chest surgery · 2025Review
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery may be performed either with cardiopulmonary bypass (on pump) or without cardiopulmonary bypass (off pump). We report the 5-year clinical outcomes in patients who had been included in the Veterans Affairs trial of on-pump versus off-pump CABG.
methodsFrom February 2002 through June 2007, we randomly assigned 2203 patients at 18 medical centers to undergo either on-pump or off-pump CABG, with 1-year assessments completed by May 2008. The two primary 5-year outcomes were death from any cause and a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death from any cause, repeat revascularization (CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention), or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Secondary 5-year outcomes included death from cardiac causes, repeat revascularization, and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Primary outcomes were assessed at a P value of 0.05 or less, and secondary outcomes at a P value of 0.01 or less.
resultsThe rate of death at 5 years was 15.2% in the off-pump group versus 11.9% in the on-pump group (relative risk, 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.58; P=0.02). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events at 5 years was 31.0% in the off-pump group versus 27.1% in the on-pump group (relative risk, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.30; P=0.046). For the 5-year secondary outcomes, no significant differences were observed: for nonfatal myocardial infarction, the rate was 12.1% in the off-pump group and 9.6% in the on-pump group (P=0.05); for death from cardiac causes, the rate was 6.3% and 5.3%, respectively (P=0.29); for repeat revascularization, the rate was 13.1% and 11.9%, respectively (P=0.39); and for repeat CABG, the rate was 1.4% and 0.5%, respectively (P=0.02).
conclusionsIn this randomized trial, off-pump CABG led to lower rates of 5-year survival and event-free survival than on-pump CABG. (Funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development Cooperative Studies Program and others; ROOBY-FS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01924442 .).
Indexed as
Identifiers
28813218What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.