Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28812811›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2017

The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy.

Ewen Speed, Russell Mannion

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Global Polycrisis and Health Inequalities.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioethics in the Times of Contagious Populism.Developing world bioethics · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Public Epistemologies and Intellectual Interventions in Contemporary Italy.International journal of politics, culture, and society · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Helping global health topics go viral online.Journal of global health · 2020
    Article
  18. On Folk Devils, Moral Panics and New Wave Public Health.International journal of health policy and management · 2019
    Article
  19. Statistics in Dutch policy debates on health and healthcare.Health research policy and systems · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ewen SpeedSchool of Health and Human Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Russell MannionHealth Services Management Center, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the rise of populism and populist leaders, movements and policies in many pluralist liberal democracies, with Brexit and the election of Trump the two most recent high profile examples of this backlash against established political elites and the institutions that support them. This new populism is underpinned by a post-truth politics which is using social media as a mouthpiece for 'fake news' and 'alternative facts' with the intention of inciting fear and hatred of 'the other' and thereby helping to justify discriminatory health policies for marginalised groups. In this article, we explore what is meant by populism and highlight some of the challenges for health and health policy posed by the new wave of post-truth populism.

Indexed as

DemocracyHealth PolicyPoliticsHumansHealth PolicyLiberal DemocracyPopulismPost-truth Politics

Identifiers

PMID28812811
PMCPMC5417145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.