Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28812673›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2017

Craniofacial diversification in the domestic pigeon and the evolution of the avian skull.

Nathan M Young, Marta Linde-Medina, John W Fondon, Benedikt Hallgrímsson, Ralph S Marcucio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Conserved physical mechanisms of cell and tissue elongation.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Cranial shape variation in domestication: A pilot study on the case of rabbits.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. De-Extinction.Genes · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathan M YoungUniversity of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2550 23rd Street, San Francisco, California 94115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-7493
Marta Linde-MedinaUniversity of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2550 23rd Street, San Francisco, California 94115, USA.
John W FondonUniversity of Texas at Arlington, Department of Biological Sciences, Texas 76019, USA.
Benedikt HallgrímssonUniversity of Calgary, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy and the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-9103
Ralph S MarcucioUniversity of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2550 23rd Street, San Francisco, California 94115, USA.

Funding

The role of continuous phenotypic variation in structural defects of the faceR01DE019638 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Benedikt Hallgrimsson, Ralph S Marcucio · 2010 to 2026
$7.3M
Developmental mechanisms underlying genotype-phenotype correlationsR01DE021708 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HALLGRIMSSON, BENEDIKT, MARCUCIO, RALPH S · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
A Molecular Investigation of Growth and Shape Variation in Cleft-Lip EtiologyF32DE018596 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI YOUNG, NATHAN MICHAEL · 2007 to 2008
$109k
NIDCR NIH HHS F32 DE018596NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE019638NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question in evolutionary developmental biology is how highly conserved developmental systems can generate the remarkable phenotypic diversity observed among distantly related species. In part, this paradox reflects our limited knowledge about the potential for species to both respond to selection and generate novel variation. Consequently, the developmental links between small-scale microevolutionary variations within populations to larger macroevolutionary patterns among species remain unbridged. Domesticated species, such as the pigeon, are unique resources for addressing this question, because a history of strong artificial selection has significantly increased morphological diversity, offering a direct comparison of the developmental potential of a single species to broader evolutionary patterns. Here, we demonstrate that patterns of variation and covariation within and between the face and braincase in domesticated breeds of the pigeon are predictive of avian cranial evolution. These results indicate that selection on variation generated by a conserved developmental system is sufficient to explain the evolution of crania as different in shape as the albatross or eagle, parakeet or hummingbird. These 'rules' of cranio-facial variation are a common pattern in the evolution of a broad diversity of vertebrate species and may ultimately reflect structural limitations of a shared embryonic bauplan on functional variation.

Identifiers

PMID28812673
PMCPMC5559897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.