ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018
Murine pulmonary imaging at 7T: T2* and T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Longitudinal relaxation rate (Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Pooled it
- Multidimensional lung imaging: integrated preclinical platforms enabling the identification of translational biomarkers for pulmonary research.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Ultrashort Echo Time and Zero Echo Time MRI and Their Applications at High Magnetic Fields: A Literature Survey.Investigative magnetic resonance imaging · 2024Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Monocrotaline-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension in Rats Using Radial Scanning with Retrospective Gating.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of undersampling on preclinical lung TJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2024Article
- Assessment of Left Lung Remodeling With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Murine Model Following Exposure to Douglas Fir Smoke.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024Article
- Assessment of iron nanoparticle distribution in mouse models using ultrashort-echo-time MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2022Article
- Preclinical MRI to Quantify Pulmonary Disease Severity and Trajectories in Poorly Characterized Mouse Models: A Pedagogical Example Using Data from Novel Transgenic Models of Lung Fibrosis.Journal of magnetic resonance open · 2021Article
- Fast quantitative three-dimensional ultrashort echo time (UTE) Cones magnetic resonance imaging of major tissues in the knee joint using extended sprial sampling.NMR in biomedicine · 2020Article
- Preclinical hyperpolarizedNMR in biomedicine · 2020Article
- Mapping and correcting hyperpolarized magnetization decay with radial keyhole imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Longitudinal free-breathing MRI measurement of murine lung physiology in a progressive model of lung fibrosis.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2019Article
- Feasibility of measuring blood-brain barrier permeability using ultra-short echo time radial magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo measure the T2* and T
methodsEllipsoidal field-of-view was created by expanding uniform spherical k-space coverage. The effects of T2* and ellipsoidal sampling on image resolution were investigated by using point-spread-function analysis and resolution phantoms. Finally, this ellipsoidal sampling approach was used to measure the lung T2* and T
resultsLung parenchyma T2* of 17- to 23-week-old mice at 7T was 0.395 ± 0.033 ms. T
conclusionUsing these techniques, the first T2* and T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.