ReviewIrish journal of medical science2018
In light of recently published clinical trials and their implication for clinical practice, does a large catchment area acute hospital require 24 hour CT neck and head angiography and/or neuro-interventional services in the setting of acute ischaemic stroke?
Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently published clinical trials have resulted in a significant change in the guidelines used to manage patients suffering an acute ischaemic stroke. New neuro-interventional techniques have revolutionised stroke outcomes. Currently, such services are only available in two specialist centres.
aimsWe attempted to evaluate the need for the provision of routine computed tomography (CT) angiography and neuro-interventional services at a university teaching hospital in Limerick.
methodsA retrospective study was performed based on data collated by the stroke service, University Hospital Limerick (UHL). All patients with a suspected acute ischaemic stroke of anterior circulation and known evolution were included. Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics, thrombolysis data, stroke unit admission rates and discharge destinations were recorded.
resultsAll 141 patients were suitable for CT angiography and should be performed in accordance with guidelines. Additionally, 165 patients excluded from the study due to an unknown stroke evolution timeframe may have benefitted. Non-contrast CT scan confirmed just 12 anterior circulation strokes. The need for neuro-interventional services proved more difficult to assess, primarily due to the lack of provision of routine CT angiography, employed to confirm anterior circulation occlusion. Secondary results showed a thrombolysis rate of 10.8% and confirmed that time efficiencies result in higher thrombolysis eligibility rates. Stroke unit admissions and discharge destinations were also recorded.
conclusionUHL should provide routine CT angiography to all patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke in line with current guidelines. The need for provision of neuro-interventional services on-site proved more difficult to assess and requires further analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.