Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28812212›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2017

Obesity Treatment with Botulinum Toxin-A Is Not Effective: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fabio Bustamante, Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Diogo Turiani H de Moura, Eduardo Turiani H de Moura, Manoel Galvão, Marco Aurélio Santo, Eduardo Guimarães H de Moura

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Advances and future directions in endoscopic bariatric therapies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  4. Endoscopic bariatrics: Current status and emerging technologies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bariatric and Metabolic Endoscopy: A New Paradigm.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  18. Gastric Botulinum Toxin-A Application for Weight Loss Therapy.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio BustamanteGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Dr. Arnaldo Av, 455, São Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil.
Vitor Ottoboni BrunaldiGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Dr. Arnaldo Av, 455, São Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil. vbrunaldi@gmail.com.
Wanderley Marques BernardoGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Dr. Arnaldo Av, 455, São Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil.
Diogo Turiani H de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Dr. Arnaldo Av, 455, São Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil.
Eduardo Turiani H de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Dr. Arnaldo Av, 455, São Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil.
Manoel GalvãoUnit of Endoscopy - Gastro Obeso Center, Barata Ribeiro St. 237, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio SantoBariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Guimarães H de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Dr. Arnaldo Av, 455, São Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRGastro Obeso Center · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of gastric injections of botulinum toxin-A (BTA) as primary treatment for obesity is not well known since results in literature are discrepant. Hence, we aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the available data to assess the real effect of BTA therapy. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, SCOPUS, EBSCO, LILACS, and BVS. We considered eligible only randomized controlled trials enrolling obese patients comparing BTA versus saline injections. Our initial search identified 8811 records. Six studies fulfilled eligibility criteria. After critical appraisal, two articles were excluded and we meta-analyzed the remainder. The mean difference for absolute weight loss and BMI reduction were 0.12 [CI 95%, - 1.14, 1.38] and - 0.06 [95% CI, - 0.92, 0.81], respectively. Therefore, we concluded that treatment of obesity with BTA is not effective.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AHumansNeuromuscular AgentsObesityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment FailureWeight LossBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular AgentsBotulinum toxinsEndoscopyGastric emptyingMeta-analysisObesitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28812212
OpenAlexW2746450008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.