ArticleBJPsych bulletin2017
Shared decision-making in medication management: development of a training intervention.
Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collaboration With Clinicians in Inpatient Mental Healthcare: A Qualitative Investigation of Consumer Perspectives.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Empowering safe medication practices: translation and validation of the Malay inpatient medication-safety involvement scale (M-IMSIS).BMC health services research · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Nudge Interventions to Optimize Medication Prescribing.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Shared and Supported Decision Making in Medication in a Mental Health Setting: How Far Have We Come?Community mental health journal · 2021Article
- SDM Training Modules for Health and Social Care Professionals in Israel.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2020Review
- Article
- Making decisions about antipsychotics: a qualitative study of patient experience and the development of a decision aid.BMC psychiatry · 2019Article
- The Place of Social Recovery in Mental Health and Related Services.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Review
- Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shared decision-making is a collaborative process in which clinicians and patients make treatment decisions together. Although it is considered essential to patient-centred care, the adoption of shared decision-making into routine clinical practice has been slow, and there is a need to increase implementation. This paper describes the development and delivery of a training intervention to promote shared decision-making in medication management in mental health as part of the Shared Involvement in Medication Management Education (ShIMME) project. Three stakeholder groups (service users, care coordinators and psychiatrists) received training in shared decision-making, and their feedback was evaluated. The programme was mostly well received, with all groups rating interaction with peers as the best aspect of the training. This small-scale pilot shows that it is feasible to deliver training in shared decision-making to several key stakeholders. Larger studies will be required to assess the effectiveness of such training.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.