ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2017
Angiomyofibroblastoma of the vulva diagnosed preoperatively: A case report.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vulvar angiomyofibroblastoma misdiagnosed as subcutaneous lipoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Rare case of huge vulvar angiomyofibroblastoma in a young female.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Vaginal Angiomyofibroblastoma: A Case Report and Review of Diagnostic Imaging.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 50-year-old woman (gravida 2, para 2) first noticed a small nodule in the right labium majus 2 years prior to the initial visit to the Hachinohe Red Cross Hospital (Hachinohe, Japan), which had gradually increased in size. On physical examination, a well-circumscribed, elastic, firm, goose egg-sized, subcutaneous mass protruding from the right labium majus was identified. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the lesion was hypointense on T1-weighted images and was well-circumscribed, strongly enhanced and homogeneous on gadolinium-enhanced images, measuring 7.5×4 cm. The same tumor had measured 2.6 cm on an MRI performed 6 years earlier. Based on the clinical course and imaging findings, angiomyofibroblastoma was diagnosed and surgical resection of the tumor was performed. The tumor was well-circumscribed and highly vascular. The intraoperative blood loss was 70 ml. Histopathologically, the tumor cells were concentrated around blood vessels, were spindle-shaped to oval with mild atypia, and were positive for vimentin, desmin, neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM), CD-34, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, and negative for S-100. Based on these findings, the diagnosis of angiomyofibroblastoma was confirmed. Angiomyofibroblastoma is a benign mesenchymal tumor that occurs in the female external genitalia. Differentiation of this tumor from aggressive angiomyxoma, a fast-growing infiltrative malignancy that occurs in the same region, may be challenging. The diagnosis of angiomyofibroblastoma is usually based on the histopathological findings of the resected specimen. The present case is of value, as the angiomyofibroblastoma was successfully diagnosed preoperatively based on the clinical course and imaging findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.