ArticleEcology and evolution2017
Genome size in arthropods; different roles of phylogeny, habitat and life history in insects and crustaceans.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The dynamics of transposable element content in the genome of the human pathogen Histoplasma.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2026Article
- Genome size estimation and evolution trends in Acari.Experimental & applied acarology · 2025Article
- A comparative analysis of transposable element diversity and evolution across 75 bee genomes.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Comparing Small and Large Genomes Within Monogonont Rotifers.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- A study of repetitive sequences in the genome ofPeerJ · 2025Article
- Comparative genomics reveals carbohydrate enzymatic fluctuations and herbivorous adaptations in arthropods.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- The evolutionary dynamics of genome sizes and repetitive elements in Ensifera (Insecta: Orthoptera).BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Spatial and Temporal Variation of Precipitation Drives the Genome Size Variation inEcology and evolution · 2024Article
- High-quality chromosome-level genome assembly of femaleHeliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Variation in temperature of peak trait performance constrains adaptation of arthropod populations to climatic warming.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- Ecological factors and parity mode correlate with genome size variation in squamate reptiles.BMC ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Major Revisions in Pancrustacean Phylogeny and Evidence of Sensitivity to Taxon Sampling.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Review
- DNA sequencing in the classroom: complete genome sequence of two earwig (Dermaptera; Insecta) species.Biological research · 2023Article
- Article
- Metamorphosis Imposes Variable Constraints on Genome Expansion through Effects on Development.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Transposable element expansion and low-level piRNA silencing in grasshoppers may cause genome gigantism.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Experimental Crossing Confirms Reproductive Isolation between Cryptic Species withinInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the major role of genome size for physiology, ecology, and evolution, there is still mixed evidence with regard to proximate and ultimate drivers. The main causes of large genome size are proliferation of noncoding elements and/or duplication events. The relative role and interplay between these proximate causes and the evolutionary patterns shaped by phylogeny, life history traits or environment are largely unknown for the arthropods. Genome size shows a tremendous variability in this group, and it has a major impact on a range of fitness-related parameters such as growth, metabolism, life history traits, and for many species also body size. In this study, we compared genome size in two major arthropod groups, insects and crustaceans, and related this to phylogenetic patterns and parameters affecting ambient temperature (latitude, depth, or altitude), insect developmental mode, as well as crustacean body size and habitat, for species where data were available. For the insects, the genome size is clearly phylogeny-dependent, reflecting primarily their life history and mode of development, while for crustaceans there was a weaker association between genome size and phylogeny, suggesting life cycle strategies and habitat as more important determinants. Maximum observed latitude and depth, and their combined effect, showed positive, and possibly phylogenetic independent, correlations with genome size for crustaceans. This study illustrate the striking difference in genome sizes both between and within these two major groups of arthropods, and that while living in the cold with low developmental rates may promote large genomes in marine crustaceans, there is a multitude of proximate and ultimate drivers of genome size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.