Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28811730›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2017

Racial Differences in Prostate Cancer Treatment: The Role of Socioeconomic Status.

Megan Watson, David Grande, Archana Radhakrishnan, Nandita Mitra, Katelyn R Ward, Craig Evan Pollack

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical outcomes in men of diverse ethnic backgrounds with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The impact of socioeconomic status on the survival of men with early-onset prostate cancer.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan WatsonJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
David GrandeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Archana RadhakrishnanDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nandita MitraDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Katelyn R WardDivision of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Craig Evan PollackDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examines whether socioeconomic status (SES), measured at both the individual and neighborhood levels, is associated with receipt of definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer and whether these associations mediate racial differences in treatment between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black men.

designThe Philadelphia Area Prostate Cancer Access Study (P

settingEight counties in southeastern Pennsylvania.

participants2,386 men with prostate adenocarcinoma. MAIN MEASURES: Receipt of definitive treatment, race, self-reported income, education, employment status, and neighborhood SES.

resultsOverall, Black and White men were equally likely to receive definitive treatment. Men living in neighborhoods with higher SES were more likely to receive definitive treatment (OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.01, 2.42). Among men who received definitive treatment, Black men were significantly less likely to receive radical prostatectomy compared with White men (OR .71, 95% CI .52, .98), as were men with some college education compared with those with a high school education or less (OR .66, 95% CI .47, .94). SES does not mediate racial differences in receipt of definitive treatment or the type of definitive treatment received, and associations with income or employment status were not significant.

conclusionsThese results stress the importance of examining racial disparities within geographic areas and highlight the unique associations that different measures of SES, particularly neighborhood SES and education, may have with prostate cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Racial GroupsRegistriesAdenocarcinomaAdolescentAdultAgedCombined Modality TherapyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaProstatic NeoplasmsSocial ClassYoung AdultProstate CancerRaceSocioeconomic StatusTreatment

Identifiers

PMID28811730
PMCPMC5517137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.