Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28811556›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Evolutionary mechanisms of runaway chromosome number change in Agrodiaetus butterflies.

Alisa O Vershinina, Vladimir A Lukhtanov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Speciation through chromosomal fusion and fission in Lepidoptera.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chromosomal Instability and Chromoanagenesis as Forces for Genomic Evolution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chromosomal conservatism vs chromosomal megaevolution: enigma of karyotypic evolution in Lepidoptera.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chromosomal and DNA barcode analysis of theComparative cytogenetics · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Rapid chromosomal evolution in the bush-cricketComparative cytogenetics · 2020
    Article
  15. Karyotype and DNA barcode ofComparative cytogenetics · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Versatility of multivalent orientation, inverted meiosis, and rescued fitness in holocentric chromosomal hybrids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alisa O VershininaDepartment of Karyosystematics, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia. vershininaalissa@gmail.com.
Vladimir A LukhtanovDepartment of Karyosystematics, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia. lukhtanov@mail.ru.ORCID 0000-0003-2856-2075
St Petersburg University · RUUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite predictions of the classic, hybrid-sterility model of chromosomal speciation, some organisms demonstrate high rate of karyotype evolution. This rate is especially impressive in Agrodiaetus butterflies that rapidly evolved the greatest chromosome number diversity known in animal kingdom within a single subgenus. Here we analyzed karyotype evolution in Agrodiaetus using phylogenetic comparative methods. We found that chromosome numbers possess a strong phylogenetic signal. This disproves the chromosome megaevolution model that proposes multiple chromosome rearrangements to accumulate independently in each of closely related species. We found that Brownian motion gives a more adequate description of observed trait changes than Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model. This indicates that chromosome numbers evolve via random walk along branches of the phylogeny. We discovered a correlation between karyotype changes and phylogeny branch lengths. This gradual pattern is inconsistent with the hybrid-sterility model which, due to association of major chromosome changes with cladogenetic events, predicts a high degree of punctualism in karyotype evolution. Thus, low underdominace of chromosomal rearrangements and/or prevalence of the recombination-suppression model over the hybrid-sterility model of chromosome speciation are the most common engines of the runaway chromosome number change observed.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, InsectEvolution, MolecularKaryotypeAnimalsButterfliesGenes, InsectModels, GeneticPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID28811556
PMCPMC5557896
OpenAlexW2742443659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.