Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28811548›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Ligand binding modes from low resolution GPCR models and mutagenesis: chicken bitter taste receptor as a test-case.

Antonella Di Pizio, Louisa-Marie Kruetzfeldt, Shira Cheled-Shoval, Wolfgang Meyerhof, Maik Behrens, Masha Y Niv

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bitter Taste Perception in Chickens.The journal of poultry science · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In Silico Molecular Study of Tryptophan Bitterness.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonella Di PizioThe Institute of Biochemistry, Food and Nutrition, The Robert H Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University, 76100 Rehovot, and The Fritz Haber Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel. adipizio@mail.huji.ac.il.
Louisa-Marie KruetzfeldtGerman Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Dept. Molecular Genetics, 14558, Nuthetal, Germany.
Shira Cheled-ShovalThe Institute of Biochemistry, Food and Nutrition, The Robert H Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University, 76100 Rehovot, and The Fritz Haber Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel.
Wolfgang MeyerhofGerman Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Dept. Molecular Genetics, 14558, Nuthetal, Germany.
Maik BehrensGerman Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Dept. Molecular Genetics, 14558, Nuthetal, Germany.
Masha Y NivThe Institute of Biochemistry, Food and Nutrition, The Robert H Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University, 76100 Rehovot, and The Fritz Haber Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel. masha.niv@mail.huji.ac.il.
German Institute of Human Nutrition · DEHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bitter taste is one of the basic taste modalities, warning against consuming potential poisons. Bitter compounds activate members of the bitter taste receptor (Tas2r) subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The number of functional Tas2rs is species-dependent. Chickens represent an intriguing minimalistic model, because they detect the bitter taste of structurally different molecules with merely three bitter taste receptor subtypes. We investigated the binding modes of several known agonists of a representative chicken bitter taste receptor, ggTas2r1. Because of low sequence similarity between ggTas2r1 and crystallized GPCRs (~10% identity, ~30% similarity at most), the combination of computational approaches with site-directed mutagenesis was used to characterize the agonist-bound conformation of ggTas2r1 binding site between TMs 3, 5, 6 and 7. We found that the ligand interactions with N93 in TM3 and/or N247 in TM5, combined with hydrophobic contacts, are typically involved in agonist recognition. Next, the ggTas2r1 structural model was successfully used to identify three quinine analogues (epiquinidine, ethylhydrocupreine, quinidine) as new ggTas2r1 agonists. The integrated approach validated here may be applicable to additional cases where the sequence identity of the GPCR of interest and the existing experimental structures is low.

Indexed as

LigandsMutagenesisAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBinding SitesChickensDrug DiscoveryHydrogen BondingMolecular ConformationMolecular StructureProtein BindingQuinineReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledStructure-Activity RelationshipTaste BudsLigandsQuinineReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID28811548
PMCPMC5557796
OpenAlexW2744963957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.