Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28811341›Full record

ReviewmBio2017

The U.S. Culture Collection Network Responding to the Requirements of the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing.

Kevin McCluskey, Katharine B Barker, Hazel A Barton, Kyria Boundy-Mills, Daniel R Brown, Jonathan A Coddington, Kevin Cook, Philippe Desmeth, David Geiser, Jessie A Glaeser and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mBio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Identification of oleaginous yeasts that metabolize aromatic compounds.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Kevin McCluskeyFungal Genetic Stock Center, Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA mccluskeyk@ksu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7011-0465
Katharine B BarkerNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
Hazel A BartonDepartment of Biology, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, USA.
Kyria Boundy-MillsPhaff Yeast Culture Collection, Food Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Daniel R BrownInfectious Diseases and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Jonathan A CoddingtonGlobal Genome Initiative, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
Kevin CookBloomington Drosophila Stock Center, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Philippe DesmethBelgian Science Policy Office, Brussels, Belgium.
David GeiserThe Fusarium Research Center, Penn State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jessie A GlaeserU.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Center for Forest Mycology Research, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Stephanie GreeneUSDA National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Seogchan KangPenn State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael W LomasNational Center for Marine Algae and Microbiota, East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, USA.
Ulrich MelcherOklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Scott E MillerSmithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
David R NoblesUTEX Culture Collection of Algae, Austin, Texas, USA.
Kristina J OwensEversole Associates, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jerome H ReichmanDuke University School of Law, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Manuela da SilvaFiocruz - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
John WertzE. coli Stock Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Cale WhitworthBloomington Drosophila Stock Center, Department of Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
David SmithCABI, Surrey, United Kingdom.

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. Culture Collection Network held a meeting to share information about how culture collections are responding to the requirements of the recently enacted Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The meeting included representatives of many culture collections and other biological collections, the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Secretariat of the CBD, interested scientific societies, and collection groups, including Scientific Collections International and the Global Genome Biodiversity Network. The participants learned about the policies of the United States and other countries regarding access to genetic resources, the definition of genetic resources, and the status of historical materials and genetic sequence information. Key topics included what constitutes access and how the CBD Access and Benefit-Sharing Clearing-House can help guide researchers through the process of obtaining Prior Informed Consent on Mutually Agreed Terms. U.S. scientists and their international collaborators are required to follow the regulations of other countries when working with microbes originally isolated outside the United States, and the local regulations required by the Nagoya Protocol vary by the country of origin of the genetic resource. Managers of diverse living collections in the United States described their holdings and their efforts to provide access to genetic resources. This meeting laid the foundation for cooperation in establishing a set of standard operating procedures for U.S. and international culture collections in response to the Nagoya Protocol.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological Specimen BanksEnvironmental MicrobiologyAgricultureBiotechnologyDatabases, GeneticModels, GeneticUnited StatesUnited States Department of Agriculturebiodiversitybiotechnologyenvironmental microbiologygenetic modelsgenome sequence

Identifiers

PMID28811341
PMCPMC5559631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.