Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28811270›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2017

Developing and Evaluating JIApp: Acceptability and Usability of a Smartphone App System to Improve Self-Management in Young People With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Ran A Cai, Dominik Beste, Hema Chaplin, Socrates Varakliotis, Linda Suffield, Francesca Josephs, Debajit Sen, Lucy R Wedderburn, Yiannakis Ioannou, Stephen Hailes and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Student engagement profiles in a mobile app: Links to self-regulated learning and performance.Educational technology research and development : ETR & D · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ran A CaiArthritis Research UK Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-8066
Dominik BesteDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5738-8806
Hema ChaplinArthritis Research UK Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9402-9669
Socrates VarakliotisDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5265-8205
Linda SuffieldArthritis Research UK Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-9438
Francesca JosephsArthritis Research UK Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1034-722X
Debajit SenArthritis Research UK Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4760-1674
Lucy R WedderburnArthritis Research UK Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7495-1429
Yiannakis IoannouArthritis Research UK Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1557-1928
Stephen HailesDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-3642
Despina EleftheriouArthritis Research UK Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5312-2269
University College London · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Versus Arthritis 21411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlare-ups in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are characterized by joint pain and swelling and often accompanied with fatigue, negative emotions, and reduced participation in activities. To minimize the impact of JIA on the physical and psychosocial development and well-being of young people (YP), it is essential to regularly monitor disease activity and side effects, as well as to support self-management such as adherence to treatment plans and engagement in general health-promoting behaviors. Smartphone technology has the potential to engage YP with their health care through convenient self-monitoring and easy access to information. In addition, having a more accurate summary of self-reported fluctuations in symptoms, behaviors, and psychosocial problems can help both YP and health care professionals (HCPs) better understand the patient's condition, identify barriers to self-management, and assess treatment effectiveness and additional health care needs. No comprehensive smartphone app has yet been developed in collaboration with YP with JIA, their parents, and HCPs involved in their care.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to design, develop, and evaluate the acceptability and usability of JIApp, a self-management smartphone app system for YP with JIA and HCPs.

methodsWe used a qualitative, user-centered design approach involving YP, parents, and HCPs from the rheumatology team. The study was conducted in three phases: (1) phase I focused on developing consensus on the features, content, and design of the app; (2) phase II was used for further refining and evaluating the app prototype; and (3) phase III focused on usability testing of the app. The interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsA total of 29 YP (aged 10-23, median age 17) with JIA, 7 parents, and 21 HCPs were interviewed. Major themes identified as the ones that helped inform app development in phase I were: (1) remote monitoring of symptoms, well-being, and activities; (2) treatment adherence; and (3) education and support. During phase II, three more themes emerged that informed further refinement of the app prototype. These included (4) adapting a reward system to motivate end users for using the app; (5) design of the app interface; and (6) clinical practice integration. The usability testing during phase III demonstrated high rates of overall satisfaction and further affirmed the content validity of the app.

conclusionsWe present the development and evaluation of a smartphone app to encourage self-management and engagement with health care for YP with JIA. The app was found to have high levels of acceptability and usability among YP and HCPs and has the potential to improve health care and outcomes for this age group. Future feasibility testing in a prospective study will firmly establish the reliability, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of such an app intervention for patients with arthritis.

Indexed as

adolescentjuvenile idiopathic arthritismobile applicationsqualitative researchself-managementsmartphoneyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID28811270
PMCPMC5575419
OpenAlexW2750558025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.