Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28810872›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2017

'Repel all biters': an enhanced collection of endophilic Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis in CDC light-traps, from the Kagera Region of Tanzania, in the presence of a combination mosquito net impregnated with piperonyl butoxide and permethrin.

Corey LeClair, Judith Cronery, Enock Kessy, Elsa V E Tomás, Yohannes Kulwa, Franklin W Mosha, Mark Rowland, Natacha Protopopoff, J Derek Charlwood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Corey LeClairDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. corey_leclair@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5441-9921
Judith CroneryKilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Enock KessyKilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Elsa V E TomásMOZDAN, Morrumbene, Mozambique.
Yohannes KulwaKilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Franklin W MoshaKilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.
Mark RowlandDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Natacha ProtopopoffDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
J Derek CharlwoodDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L004437/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMosquito nets containing synergists designed to overcome metabolic resistance mechanisms in vectors have been developed. These may enhance excitability in the mosquitoes and affect how they respond to CDC light-traps. Investigating the behaviour of vectors of disease in relation to novel mosquito nets is, therefore, essential for the design of sampling and surveillance systems.

methodsIn an initial experiment in Muleba, Tanzania, nine bedrooms from three housing clusters were sampled. CDC light-traps were operated indoors next to occupied untreated nets (UTN), Olyset

resultsIn the initial experiment 97.7% of the 310 An. gambiae s.l. were An. gambiae s.s., the remainder being Anopheles arabiensis. The number of mosquitoes collected from 81 light-trap collections was greater in the presence of an Olyset [density rate ratio 1.81, 95% CI (1.22-2.67), p = 0.003] relative to an UTN. In a second experiment, in the wet season 84% of the 180 An. gambiae s.l. identified were An. arabiensis. The number of An. gambiae s.l. collected from a light-trap compared to a tent-trap was significantly higher when an Olyset Plus net was used compared to an UTN. Survival of the mosquitoes in the window trap was not reduced by the use of an Olyset Plus net in the bedroom relative to an Olyset net.

conclusionMosquitoes entering bedrooms, even those susceptible to pyrethroids, were not killed by contact with an Olyset Plus LLIN. The enhanced numbers of An. gambiae or An. arabiensis collected in light-traps when a treated net is used requires further experimentation and may be because of a heightened escape reaction on the part of the mosquito.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsAnimalsAnophelesHousingInsecticidesInsect RepellentsMosquito ControlPermethrinPiperonyl ButoxideTanzaniaInsecticidesInsect RepellentsPermethrinPiperonyl ButoxideAnophelesAnopheles gambiaeLight-trapLong lasting insecticidal netsMosquitoPiperonyl butoxideResistanceSamplingSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID28810872
PMCPMC5558705
OpenAlexW2745363643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.