Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28810831›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Application of a Bayesian non-linear model hybrid scheme to sequence data for genomic prediction and QTL mapping.

Tingting Wang, Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen, Iona M MacLeod, Jennie E Pryce, Michael E Goddard, Ben J Hayes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Selection signatures detection in Nelore, Gir, and Red Sindhi cattle breeds.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. What Can Genetics Do for the Control of Infectious Diseases in Aquaculture?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Multiple QTL underlie milk phenotypes at the CSF2RB locus.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tingting WangSchool of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia. tingting.wang@ecodev.vic.gov.au.
Yi-Ping Phoebe ChenSchool of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Iona M MacLeodAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Jennie E PryceAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Michael E GoddardAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Ben J HayesAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Melbourne, VIC, 3083, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing whole genome sequence data might improve genomic prediction accuracy, when compared with high-density SNP arrays, and could lead to identification of casual mutations affecting complex traits. For some traits, the most accurate genomic predictions are achieved with non-linear Bayesian methods. However, as the number of variants and the size of the reference population increase, the computational time required to implement these Bayesian methods (typically with Monte Carlo Markov Chain sampling) becomes unfeasibly long.

resultsHere, we applied a new method, HyB_BR (for Hybrid BayesR), which implements a mixture model of normal distributions and hybridizes an Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm followed by Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, to genomic prediction in a large dairy cattle population with imputed whole genome sequence data. The imputed whole genome sequence data included 994,019 variant genotypes of 16,214 Holstein and Jersey bulls and cows. Traits included fat yield, milk volume, protein kg, fat% and protein% in milk, as well as fertility and heat tolerance. HyB_BR achieved genomic prediction accuracies as high as the full MCMC implementation of BayesR, both for predicting a validation set of Holstein and Jersey bulls (multi-breed prediction) and a validation set of Australian Red bulls (across-breed prediction). HyB_BR had a ten fold reduction in compute time, compared with the MCMC implementation of BayesR (48 hours versus 594 hours). We also demonstrate that in many cases HyB_BR identified sequence variants with a high posterior probability of affecting the milk production or fertility traits that were similar to those identified in BayesR. For heat tolerance, both HyB_BR and BayesR found variants in or close to promising candidate genes associated with this trait and not detected by previous studies.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate that HyB_BR is a feasible method for simultaneous genomic prediction and QTL mapping with whole genome sequence in large reference populations.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenomicsNonlinear DynamicsWhole Genome SequencingAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremCattleFemaleFertilityGenotypeMarkov ChainsMilkMonte Carlo MethodPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID28810831
PMCPMC5558724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.