ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
Improving fold resistance prediction of HIV-1 against protease and reverse transcriptase inhibitors using artificial neural networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in human immunodeficiency virus mutation prediction and drug design: Advancing personalized treatment and prevention.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2025Review
- Benchmarking Machine Learning Models for HIV-1 Protease Inhibitor Resistance Prediction: Impact of Data Set Construction and Feature Representation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in assisting pathogenic microorganism diagnosis and treatment: a review of infectious skin diseases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Machine learning aided multiscale modelling of the HIV-1 infection in the presence of NRTI therapy.PeerJ · 2023Article
- Predicting HIV drug resistance using weighted machine learning method at target protein sequence-level.Molecular diversity · 2021Article
- Using machine learning and big data to explore the drug resistance landscape in HIV.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Evolution of drug resistance in HIV protease.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
- A Computational Approach for the Prediction of Treatment History and the Effectiveness or Failure of Antiretroviral Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- HIV drug resistance prediction with weighted categorical kernel functions.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Characterizing early drug resistance-related events using geometric ensembles from HIV protease dynamics.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A Computational Approach for the Prediction of HIV Resistance Based on Amino Acid and Nucleotide Descriptors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Analysis of drug resistance in HIV protease.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug resistance in HIV treatment is still a worldwide problem. Predicting resistance to antiretrovirals (ARVs) before starting any treatment is important. Prediction accuracy is essential, as low-accuracy predictions increase the risk of prescribing sub-optimal drug regimens leading to patients developing resistance sooner. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are a powerful tool that would be able to assist in drug resistance prediction. In this study, we constrained the dataset to subtype B, sacrificing generalizability for a higher predictive performance, and demonstrated that the predictive quality of the ANN regression models have definite improvement for most ARVs.
resultsTrained regression ANNs were optimized for eight protease inhibitors, six nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors and four non-nucleoside RT inhibitors by experimenting combinations of rare variant filtering (none versus 1 residue occurrence) and ANN topologies (1-3 hidden layers with 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 nodes per layer). Single hidden layers (5-20 nodes) were used for training where overfitting was detected. 5-fold cross-validation produced mean R
conclusionsOverall, higher accuracies and lower variances (compared to results published in 2016) were obtained by experimenting with various preprocessing methods, while focusing on the most prevalent subtype in the raw dataset (subtype B).We thus highlight the need to develop and make available subtype-specific datasets for developing higher accuracy in drug-resistance prediction methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.