Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28810081›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2018

A Risk Analysis Approach to Prioritizing Epidemics: Ebola Virus Disease in West Africa as a Case Study.

Whenayon Simeon Ajisegiri, Abrar Ahmad Chughtai, C Raina MacIntyre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 Global Risk: Expectation vs. Reality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Application of a Risk Analysis Tool to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) Outbreak in Saudi Arabia.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Converging and emerging threats to health security.Environment systems & decisions · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Whenayon Simeon AjisegiriSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abrar Ahmad ChughtaiSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
C Raina MacIntyreSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2014 Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak affected several countries worldwide, including six West African countries. It was the largest Ebola epidemic in the history and the first to affect multiple countries simultaneously. Significant national and international delay in response to the epidemic resulted in 28,652 cases and 11,325 deaths. The aim of this study was to develop a risk analysis framework to prioritize rapid response for situations of high risk. Based on findings from the literature, sociodemographic features of the affected countries, and documented epidemic data, a risk scoring framework using 18 criteria was developed. The framework includes measures of socioeconomics, health systems, geographical factors, cultural beliefs, and traditional practices. The three worst affected West African countries (Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia) had the highest risk scores. The scores were much lower in developed countries that experienced Ebola compared to West African countries. A more complex risk analysis framework using 18 measures was compared with a simpler one with 10 measures, and both predicted risk equally well. A simple risk scoring system can incorporate measures of hazard and impact that may otherwise be neglected in prioritizing outbreak response. This framework can be used by public health personnel as a tool to prioritize outbreak investigation and flag outbreaks with potentially catastrophic outcomes for urgent response. Such a tool could mitigate costly delays in epidemic response.

Indexed as

EbolavirusAfrica, WesternDisease OutbreaksEpidemicsGuineaHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansPublic HealthRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityUnited KingdomUnited StatesEbola virus diseaseoutbreakrisk analysisrisk frameworkWest Africa

Identifiers

PMID28810081
PMCPMC5949606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.