Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28809960›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Metrics for comparing neuronal tree shapes based on persistent homology.

Yanjie Li, Dingkang Wang, Giorgio A Ascoli, Partha Mitra, Yusu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Topological Neuroscience: Linking Circuits to Function.Annual review of neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cell morphologies in the nervous system: Glia steal the limelight.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023
    Article
  13. Circuit analysis of theNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Efficient metadata mining of web-accessible neural morphologies.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanjie LiComputer Science and Engineering Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43221, United States of America.
Dingkang WangComputer Science and Engineering Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43221, United States of America.
Giorgio A AscoliKrasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, United States of America.
Partha MitraCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, United States of America.
Yusu WangComputer Science and Engineering Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43221, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7950-4348

Funding

Generation and Description of Neuronal Morphology and ConnectivityR01NS039600 · NINDS · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A · 1999 to 2024
$6.9M
Cytoskeletal mechanisms of dendrite arbor shape developmentR01NS086082 · NINDS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ASCOLI, GIORGIO A, COX, DANIEL N · 2013 to 2023
$3.1M
"Methods from Computational Topology and Geometry for Analysing Neuronal Tree and Graph Data"R01EB022899 · NIBIB · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI MITRA, PARTHA PRATIM, WANG, YUSU · 2016 to 2018
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022899NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039600NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As more and more neuroanatomical data are made available through efforts such as NeuroMorpho.Org and FlyCircuit.org, the need to develop computational tools to facilitate automatic knowledge discovery from such large datasets becomes more urgent. One fundamental question is how best to compare neuron structures, for instance to organize and classify large collection of neurons. We aim to develop a flexible yet powerful framework to support comparison and classification of large collection of neuron structures efficiently. Specifically we propose to use a topological persistence-based feature vectorization framework. Existing methods to vectorize a neuron (i.e, convert a neuron to a feature vector so as to support efficient comparison and/or searching) typically rely on statistics or summaries of morphometric information, such as the average or maximum local torque angle or partition asymmetry. These simple summaries have limited power in encoding global tree structures. Based on the concept of topological persistence recently developed in the field of computational topology, we vectorize each neuron structure into a simple yet informative summary. In particular, each type of information of interest can be represented as a descriptor function defined on the neuron tree, which is then mapped to a simple persistence-signature. Our framework can encode both local and global tree structure, as well as other information of interest (electrophysiological or dynamical measures), by considering multiple descriptor functions on the neuron. The resulting persistence-based signature is potentially more informative than simple statistical summaries (such as average/mean/max) of morphometric quantities-Indeed, we show that using a certain descriptor function will give a persistence-based signature containing strictly more information than the classical Sholl analysis. At the same time, our framework retains the efficiency associated with treating neurons as points in a simple Euclidean feature space, which would be important for constructing efficient searching or indexing structures over them. We present preliminary experimental results to demonstrate the effectiveness of our persistence-based neuronal feature vectorization framework.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsElectrophysiologyNeuroanatomyNeurons

Identifiers

PMID28809960
PMCPMC5557505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.