ArticlePloS one2017
Metrics for comparing neuronal tree shapes based on persistent homology.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topologically-based parameter inference for agent-based model selection from spatiotemporal cellular data.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Topological Neuroscience: Linking Circuits to Function.Annual review of neuroscience · 2025Review
- Skeletonization of neuronal processes using Discrete Morse techniques from computational topology.Research square · 2025Article
- Correlative light and electron microscopy reveals the fine circuit structure underlying evidence accumulation in larval zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Skeletonization of neuronal processes using Discrete Morse techniques from computational topology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Skeletonization of neuronal processes using Discrete Morse techniques from computational topology.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Accelerating the continuous community sharing of digital neuromorphology data.FASEB bioAdvances · 2024Article
- DSM: Deep sequential model for complete neuronal morphology representation and feature extraction.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- A robust approach to 3D neuron shape representation for quantification and classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- BigNeuron: a resource to benchmark and predict performance of algorithms for automated tracing of neurons in light microscopy datasets.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Local Microtubule and F-Actin Distributions Fully Constrain the Spatial Geometry ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cell morphologies in the nervous system: Glia steal the limelight.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023Article
- Circuit analysis of theNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Neuron tracing from light microscopy images: automation, deep learning and bench testing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Review
- A tool for mapping microglial morphology, morphOMICs, reveals brain-region and sex-dependent phenotypes.Nature neuroscience · 2022Article
- Olfactory responses ofeLife · 2022Article
- Large scale similarity search across digital reconstructions of neural morphology.Neuroscience research · 2022Article
- Topological Sholl descriptors for neuronal clustering and classification.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Smart imaging to empower brain-wide neuroscience at single-cell levels.Brain informatics · 2022Review
- Efficient metadata mining of web-accessible neural morphologies.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As more and more neuroanatomical data are made available through efforts such as NeuroMorpho.Org and FlyCircuit.org, the need to develop computational tools to facilitate automatic knowledge discovery from such large datasets becomes more urgent. One fundamental question is how best to compare neuron structures, for instance to organize and classify large collection of neurons. We aim to develop a flexible yet powerful framework to support comparison and classification of large collection of neuron structures efficiently. Specifically we propose to use a topological persistence-based feature vectorization framework. Existing methods to vectorize a neuron (i.e, convert a neuron to a feature vector so as to support efficient comparison and/or searching) typically rely on statistics or summaries of morphometric information, such as the average or maximum local torque angle or partition asymmetry. These simple summaries have limited power in encoding global tree structures. Based on the concept of topological persistence recently developed in the field of computational topology, we vectorize each neuron structure into a simple yet informative summary. In particular, each type of information of interest can be represented as a descriptor function defined on the neuron tree, which is then mapped to a simple persistence-signature. Our framework can encode both local and global tree structure, as well as other information of interest (electrophysiological or dynamical measures), by considering multiple descriptor functions on the neuron. The resulting persistence-based signature is potentially more informative than simple statistical summaries (such as average/mean/max) of morphometric quantities-Indeed, we show that using a certain descriptor function will give a persistence-based signature containing strictly more information than the classical Sholl analysis. At the same time, our framework retains the efficiency associated with treating neurons as points in a simple Euclidean feature space, which would be important for constructing efficient searching or indexing structures over them. We present preliminary experimental results to demonstrate the effectiveness of our persistence-based neuronal feature vectorization framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.