Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28809953›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Monitoring health and reproductive status of olms (Proteus anguinus) by ultrasound.

Susanne Holtze, Maja Lukač, Ivan Cizelj, Frank Mutschmann, Claudia Anita Szentiks, Dušan Jelić, Robert Hermes, Frank Göritz, Stanton Braude, Thomas Bernd Hildebrandt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Towards evidence-based conservation of subterranean ecosystems.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. An Update on Neuroaging on Earth and in Spaceflight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Alternative Animal Models of Aging Research.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Susanne HoltzeDepartment of Reproduction Management, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4654-1916
Maja LukačDepartment of Poultry Diseases with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivan CizeljZagreb Zoo, Zagreb, Croatia.
Frank MutschmannExomed - Institut für veterinärmedizinische Betreuung niederer Wirbeltiere und Exoten GbR, Berlin, Germany.
Claudia Anita SzentiksDepartment of Wildlife Diseases, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Dušan JelićCroatian Institute for Biodiversity, Zagreb, Croatia.
Robert HermesDepartment of Reproduction Management, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Frank GöritzDepartment of Reproduction Management, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Stanton BraudeDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Thomas Bernd HildebrandtDepartment of Reproduction Management, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research · DECroatian Veterinary Institute · HRNierenzentrum Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Zagreb · HRWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The olm (Proteus anguinus) is a troglomorphic, neotenous amphibian with extraordinary life expectancy and unique adaptations that deserve further investigation. A low reproductive rate and habitat decline render it threatened by extinction. Establishing captive populations for maintenance and artificial breeding may one day become crucial to the species. Longitudinal, in-vivo assessment of inner organs is invaluable to our understanding of reproductive physiology, health, and behavior. Using ultrasound, we measured heart rate and assessed health and reproductive status of 13 captive olms at Zagreb Zoo. Heart rate averaged 42.9 ± 4.6 bpm (32-55 bpm), as determined via pulsed-wave Doppler at 4-12 MHz. By using frequencies of up to 70 MHz (ultrasound biomicroscopy), inner organs were visualized in detail. Assessment of the gastrointestinal tract provided insights into feeding status and digestive processes. Several subclinical pathologies were detected, including biliary sludge, subcutaneous edema, ascites, and skin lesions. Detection of skin lesions by ultrasound was more sensitive than visual adspection. Olms with ultrasonographically detected skin lesions tested positive for Saprolegnia and were treated. Three of the four affected individuals survived and subsequently tested negative for Saprolegnia. Sex was reliably determined; only one individual proved male. The reason for this extreme female-biased sex-ratio remains unknown. However, as most of the individuals were flushed from the caves by strong currents in spring, the sample may not be representative of natural populations. In female olms, different stages of ovarian follicular development were observed with diameters ranging between 0.1 and 1.1 mm. Results were confirmed by comparing ultrasound, necropsy, and histological findings of one dead specimen. In summary, ultrasound proved a valuable tool to support conservation and captive breeding programs by allowing non-invasive assessment of physiological parameters, clinical condition, and reproductive status in olms.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyAmphibiansAnimalsFemaleHeart RateMaleOvarian FollicleReproduction

Identifiers

PMID28809953
PMCPMC5557490
OpenAlexW2746825720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.