Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28808924›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2017

A Critical Evaluation on MOH Current Treatments.

Andrea Negro, Martina Curto, Luana Lionetto, Simona Guerzoni, Luigi Alberto Pini, Paolo Martelletti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea NegroDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. andrea.negro@uniroma1.it.
Martina CurtoDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luana LionettoAdvanced Molecular Diagnostics Unit, IDI Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata - IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Simona GuerzoniDepartment of Diagnostic and Clinical Medicine and Public Health, Proteomic Lab, Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Luigi Alberto PiniDepartment of Diagnostic and Clinical Medicine and Public Health, Proteomic Lab, Center for Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Paolo MartellettiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementMigraine is the most frequent neurological disorder observed in clinical practice characterized by moderate to severe pain attacks associated with neurological, gastrointestinal, and dysautonomic symptoms. Each year, 2.5% of patients with episodic migraine develop chronic migraine (CM). CM is characterized by high frequency of the attacks that may result into chronic intake of abortive medications. Nearly, the 70% of CM patients referring to tertiary head centers show acute pain medications overuse that may lead to the development of medication overuse headache (MOH). The management of MOH requires three steps: (1) education, (2) withdrawal of the overuse drug and detoxification, and (3) re-prophylaxis. In the last years, several real-life prospective studies provided further evidence in clinical setting of the onabotulinumtoxinA 155-195 U efficacy for the headache prophylaxis in CM with MOH patients. There is a general agreement on two factors: (1) withdrawal of the overuse drug is condicio sine qua non to reverse the pattern to medium-low-frequency migraine, and (2) the focus of management needs to shift from acute treatment of pain to prevention of headache. CM patients close to developing MOH, patients with high-frequency episodic migraine, and those already abusing of drugs require special attention and should refer to tertiary headache centers. For all of them, a solution could be an "early treatment." Early should be their referral to a tertiary headache center, early should be the withdrawal of the overuse drug and a proper detoxification, and perhaps early should be the start of a preventative therapy.

Indexed as

Chronic migraineEarly treatmentMedication overuse headacheMigraine acute drugs overuseOnabotulinumtoxinAPreventative therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.