Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28808918›Full record

SynthesisCNS drugs2017

Idarucizumab in Dabigatran-Treated Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Alteplase: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence.

Slaven Pikija, Laszlo K Sztriha, J Sebastian Mutzenbach, Stefan M Golaszewski, Johann Sellner

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CNS drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Slaven PikijaDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Ignaz-Harrer-Str. 79, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Laszlo K SztrihaDepartment of Neurology, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
J Sebastian MutzenbachDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Ignaz-Harrer-Str. 79, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Stefan M GolaszewskiDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Ignaz-Harrer-Str. 79, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Johann SellnerDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Ignaz-Harrer-Str. 79, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. j.sellner@salk.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-5533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCurrent guidelines do not recommend the use of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute ischemic stroke who receive direct oral anticoagulants. While the humanized monoclonal antibody idarucizumab can quickly reverse the anticoagulant effects of the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, safety data for subsequent tissue plasminogen activator treatment are sparse. Here, we review current knowledge about dabigatran reversal prior to systemic reperfusion treatment in acute ischemic stroke.

methodsWe performed a systematic review of all published cases of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment following the administration of a dabigatran antidote up to June 2017 and added five unpublished cases of our own. We analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes, symptomatic post-thrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage, and other serious systemic bleeding. Additional endpoints were allergic reaction to idarucizumab, and venous thrombosis in the post-acute phase.

resultsWe identified a total of 21 patients (71% male) with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range 70-84). The median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline was 10 (n = 20, interquartile range 5-11) and 18/20 patients (90%) had mild or moderate stroke severity. The time from symptom onset to start of tissue plasminogen activator was 155 min (n = 18, interquartile range 122-214). The outcome was unfavorable in 3/19 patients (16%). There was one fatality as a result of a symptomatic post-thrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage, and two patients experienced an increase in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale compared with baseline. One patient had a recurrent stroke. No systemic bleeding, venous thrombosis, or allergic reactions were reported.

conclusionExperience with idarucizumab administration prior to tissue plasminogen activator treatment in acute ischemic stroke is limited. Initial clinical experience in less severe stroke syndromes and short time windows seems favorable. Larger cohorts are required to confirm safety, including bleeding complications and the risk of thrombosis.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntithrombinsBrain IschemiaDabigatranFemaleHemorrhageHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicStrokeTissue Plasminogen ActivatorAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntithrombinsDabigatranidarucizumabTissue Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID28808918
PMCPMC5573762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.