Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28808872›Full record

Observational studyClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2018

Analysis of blood markers for early breast cancer diagnosis.

J Bayo, M A Castaño, F Rivera, F Navarro

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Analysis of blood markers for early colorectal cancer diagnosis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Study on Urinary Candidate Metabolome for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J BayoOncology Service, Huelva Hospital Complex, Huelva, C/Ronda Norte, s/n, 21005, Huelva, Spain. juanbayo@yahoo.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1075-9806
M A CastañoClinical Analysis Service, Huelva Hospital Complex, Huelva, Spain.
F RiveraBehavioural Science Methodology Area, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
F NavarroDepartment of Integrated Sciences, Cell Biology, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
Universidad de Huelva · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer is the most common neoplasm in women and has the highest associated mortality rate. Rapid detection programmes can provide early diagnosis and increase the chances of survival. There are no specific tumor biomarkers for the early phase of the disease. The primary aim of this study was to search a blood biomarker with levels that exceeded the normal range established in the general population that could be used to screen breast cancer. METHODS/PATIENTS: Case-control study. Conventional as well as research (NGAL, EGFR and 8-OHdG) tumor biomarkers were analyzed.

resultsA total of 126 women were enrolled (cases: 63 patients with local breast cancer; Controls: 63 healthy women). Significant differences were found in patients with higher levels of the conventional markers, Ca15.3, CEA, Cyfra 21.1 and NSE. However, when commercial cut-off values were used, only Ca 15.13 was significant. In the group of research biomarkers, significantly higher levels of EGFR were found in the control group, and of 8-OHdG in the case group. Using logistic regression analysis and a ROC curve, an equation composed of five markers, Ca 15.3, NSE, NGAL, EGFR and 8-OHdG, which yielded a correct diagnostic probability of breast cancer of 91.8% was obtained.

conclusions8-OHdG has been identified as a new potential marker for screening early stage breast cancer. In addition, a model that combines five blood markers that can be used as a diagnostic test in certain groups of patients has been developed. New studies with a larger sample size are needed to verify the results obtained.

Indexed as

8-Hydroxy-2'-DeoxyguanosineAdultAgedalpha-FetoproteinsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCase-Control StudiesDeoxyguanosineEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansKeratin-19Middle Aged8-Hydroxy-2'-DeoxyguanosineAFP protein, humanalpha-Fetoproteinsantigen CYFRA21.1Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenDeoxyguanosineKeratin-19Phosphopyruvate HydrataseBreast cancerEarly diagnosisOxidative stressSerum tumor biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28808872
OpenAlexW2749723775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.