ArticleJournal of digital imaging2018
Using Natural Language Processing of Free-Text Radiology Reports to Identify Type 1 Modic Endplate Changes.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Natural Language Processing Applications in the Clinical Neurosciences: A Machine Learning Augmented Systematic Review.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review of natural language processing applied to radiology reports.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Pooled it
- Automated detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: harnessing the power of natural language processing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Rapid identification and phenotyping of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients using a machine-based approach in diverse healthcare systems.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Enhancing predictive analytics in mandibular third molar extraction using artificial intelligence: A CBCT-Based study.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
- Natural language processing-based analysis of the level of adoption by expert radiologists of the ASSR, ASNR and NASS version 2.0 of lumbar disc nomenclature: an eight-year survey.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Accurately Identifying Cerebroarterial Stenosis from Angiography Reports Using Natural Language Processing Approaches.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Closing the loop: automatically identifying abnormal imaging results in scanned documents.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Prediction of acute appendicitis among patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain at emergency department.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Natural language processing in low back pain and spine diseases: A systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Natural language processing for automated annotation of medication mentions in primary care visit conversations.JAMIA open · 2021Article
- Prediction of Stroke Outcome Using Natural Language Processing-Based Machine Learning of Radiology Report of Brain MRI.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Multi-Ontology Refined Embeddings (MORE): A hybrid multi-ontology and corpus-based semantic representation model for biomedical concepts.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020Article
- Implementing Structured Clinical Templates at a Single Tertiary Hospital: Survey Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Data Mining in Spine Surgery: Leveraging Electronic Health Records for Machine Learning and Clinical Research.Neurospine · 2019Article
- TheNPJ digital medicine · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic medical record (EMR) systems provide easy access to radiology reports and offer great potential to support quality improvement efforts and clinical research. Harnessing the full potential of the EMR requires scalable approaches such as natural language processing (NLP) to convert text into variables used for evaluation or analysis. Our goal was to determine the feasibility of using NLP to identify patients with Type 1 Modic endplate changes using clinical reports of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations of the spine. Identifying patients with Type 1 Modic change who may be eligible for clinical trials is important as these findings may be important targets for intervention. Four annotators identified all reports that contained Type 1 Modic change, using N = 458 randomly selected lumbar spine MR reports. We then implemented a rule-based NLP algorithm in Java using regular expressions. The prevalence of Type 1 Modic change in the annotated dataset was 10%. Results were recall (sensitivity) 35/50 = 0.70 (95% confidence interval (C.I.) 0.52-0.82), specificity 404/408 = 0.99 (0.97-1.0), precision (positive predictive value) 35/39 = 0.90 (0.75-0.97), negative predictive value 404/419 = 0.96 (0.94-0.98), and F1-score 0.79 (0.43-1.0). Our evaluation shows the efficacy of rule-based NLP approach for identifying patients with Type 1 Modic change if the emphasis is on identifying only relevant cases with low concern regarding false negatives. As expected, our results show that specificity is higher than recall. This is due to the inherent difficulty of eliciting all possible keywords given the enormous variability of lumbar spine reporting, which decreases recall, while availability of good negation algorithms improves specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.