Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28808762›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2018

Relationships between more than 90% coronary luminal narrowing induced by ergonovine provocation test and ECG ischemic change as well as chest symptoms.

Shozo Sueda, Hiroaki Kohno

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shozo SuedaDepartment of Cardiology, Ehime Prefectural Niihama Hospital, Hongo 3 Chome 1-1, Niihama, Ehime Prefecture, 792-0042, Japan. EZF03146@nifty.com.
Hiroaki KohnoDepartment of Cardiology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji, Japan.
National Institute of Technology, Niihama College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the clinic, patients with ≥90% luminal narrowing during ergonovine (ER) testing had variable response. We investigated ischemic findings and chest symptoms in patients with ≥90% luminal narrowing when performing ER tests, retrospectively. We performed 1210 ER tests over 26 years (1991-2016). We analyzed chest symptoms and positive ischemic ECG changes during ER tests. More than 90% luminal narrowing was found in 352 patients (29.1%) including 211 patients in the right coronary artery (RCA) and 217 patients in the left coronary artery (LCA). Chest symptom was observed in 290 patients (82.4%) including 162 patients in the RCA and 179 patients in the LCA. ST elevation was found in 154 patients including 98 in the RCA and 73 patients in the LCA, while ST depression was recognized in 81 patients including 38 patients in the RCA and 62 patients in the LCA. Two-third of patients with ≥90% luminal narrowing had significant ischemic ECG changes, whereas 60.5% of patients with ≥90% luminal narrowing complained usual chest pain accompanied with significant ischemic ECG changes. Unusual chest symptom was complained in 7.1% of patients with ≥90% luminal narrowing. Neither chest symptom nor ECG changes was found in 48 patients (13.6%) with ≥90% luminal narrowing. We should understand some limitation to diagnose positive coronary spasm during ER tests.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyAgedChest PainCoronary AngiographyCoronary OcclusionCoronary VasospasmCoronary VesselsDiagnosis, DifferentialErgonovineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjections, Intra-ArterialMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaErgonovineOxytocicsErgonovineIschemic ECGPositive spasmSymptom

Identifiers

PMID28808762
OpenAlexW2747753444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.