Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28808675›Full record

ArticleInternational scholarly research notices2017

Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy and the Developing World.

Tika Ram Bhandari, Sudha Shahi, Sarita Acharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International scholarly research notices, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Can clinical scoring systems overcome the limitations of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis in pregnancy?Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  2. Barriers to accessing appendectomy in the public sector health system in the Western Cape Province, South Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Acute amebic appendicitis in early pregnancy.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Laparostomy during pregnancy: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tika Ram BhandariDepartment of General Surgery, Universal College of Medical Sciences, Bhairahawa 32900, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0003-4424-5598
Sudha ShahiDepartment of ENT, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-5080-5673
Sarita AcharyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universal College of Medical Sciences, Bhairahawa 32900, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute appendicitis is the commonest nonobstetric surgical emergency during pregnancy. The aim of the study was to compare perioperative outcomes of acute appendicitis in pregnant and nonpregnant patients.

methodsA retrospective review of medical records of 56 pregnant patients between 2011 and 2016 who were compared with 164 nonpregnant women of reproductive age who underwent open appendectomy between 2014 and 2016 for acute appendicitis. The patient's demographics and perioperative data were analyzed.

resultsThe median age of pregnant and nonpregnant patients observed was 26 years (range 19-37) and 26 years (range 18-43). There were no significant differences between the groups in negative appendectomy (21.4 and 21.3%,

conclusionOur results of appendectomy in pregnant patients are comparable with nonpregnant patients. Hence the same perioperative treatment protocol can be followed in pregnant and nonpregnant patients even in resource-poor setting.

Identifiers

PMID28808675
PMCPMC5541817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.