Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28808563›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2017

Conceptualizing ecosystem tipping points within a physiological framework.

Christopher D G Harley, Sean D Connell, Zoë A Doubleday, Brendan Kelaher, Bayden D Russell, Gianluca Sarà, Brian Helmuth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emergent effects of global change on consumption depend on consumers and their resources in marine systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Christopher D G HarleyDepartment of Zoology and Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
Sean D ConnellSouthern Seas Ecology Laboratories School of Biological Sciences & Environment Institute University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia.
Zoë A DoubledaySouthern Seas Ecology Laboratories School of Biological Sciences & Environment Institute University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia.
Brendan KelaherNational Marine Science Centre & Centre for Coastal Biogeochemistry Research School of Environment, Science and Engineering Southern Cross University Coffs Harbour New South Wales Australia.
Bayden D RussellThe Swire Institute of Marine Science School of Biological Sciences The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong.
Gianluca SaràLaboratorio di Ecologia Sperimentale Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare Università degli Studi di Palermo Palermo Italy.
Brian HelmuthDepartment of Marine and Environmental Sciences and School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs Northeastern University Boston MA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0180-3414
The University of Adelaide · AUFisheries and Oceans Canada · CAIstituto di Scienze Marine del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche · ITNortheastern University · USSouthern Cross University · AUUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Connecting the nonlinear and often counterintuitive physiological effects of multiple environmental drivers to the emergent impacts on ecosystems is a fundamental challenge. Unfortunately, the disconnect between the way "stressors" (e.g., warming) is considered in organismal (physiological) and ecological (community) contexts continues to hamper progress. Environmental drivers typically elicit biphasic physiological responses, where performance declines at levels above and below some optimum. It is also well understood that species exhibit highly variable response surfaces to these changes so that the optimum level of any environmental driver can vary among interacting species. Thus, species interactions are unlikely to go unaltered under environmental change. However, while these nonlinear, species-specific physiological relationships between environment and performance appear to be general, rarely are they incorporated into predictions of ecological tipping points. Instead, most ecosystem-level studies focus on varying levels of "stress" and frequently assume that any deviation from "normal" environmental conditions has similar effects, albeit with different magnitudes, on all of the species within a community. We consider a framework that realigns the positive and negative physiological effects of changes in climatic and nonclimatic drivers with indirect ecological responses. Using a series of simple models based on direct physiological responses to temperature and ocean

Indexed as

food web dynamicsmultiple stressorsperformance curvesphase shiftsphysiological stressspecies interactions

Identifiers

PMID28808563
PMCPMC5551099
OpenAlexW2730072831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.