Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28808423›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biological sciences2017

In Search for Pheromone Receptors: Certain Members of the Odorant Receptor Family in the Desert Locust

Pablo Pregitzer, Xingcong Jiang, Ewald Grosse-Wilde, Heinz Breer, Jürgen Krieger, Joerg Fleischer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dibutyl phthalate released by solitary female locusts mediates sexual communication at low density.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The role of SNMPs in insect olfaction.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pablo PregitzerUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Physiology (230), Stuttgart, Germany.
Xingcong JiangUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Physiology (230), Stuttgart, Germany.
Ewald Grosse-WildeMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Jena, Germany.
Heinz BreerUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Physiology (230), Stuttgart, Germany.
Jürgen KriegerMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology/Zoology, Department of Animal Physiology, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Joerg FleischerMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology/Zoology, Department of Animal Physiology, Halle (Saale), Germany.
University of Hohenheim · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under given environmental conditions, the desert locust (

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod AntennaeGene Expression RegulationGrasshoppersInsect ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPheromonesPhylogenyReceptors, OdorantReceptors, PheromoneInsect ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPheromonesReceptors, OdorantReceptors, Pheromonesensory neuron membrane protein 1antennadesert locustinsectolfactionpheromone receptorsensory neuron membrane protein 1

Identifiers

PMID28808423
PMCPMC5555108
OpenAlexW2741639356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.