Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28808388›Full record

ArticlePharmacognosy magazine2017

R Sunil Kumar, Ramesh Balenahalli Narasingappa, Chandrashekhar G Joshi, Talakatta K Girish, Ananda Danagoudar

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacognosy magazine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reinstatement ofPhytoKeys · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R Sunil KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, University of Agriculture Sciences, Bangalore, Hassan, India.
Ramesh Balenahalli NarasingappaDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, University of Agriculture Sciences, Bangalore, Hassan, India.
Chandrashekhar G JoshiDepartment of Studies and Research in Biochemistry, P.G Centre, Mangalore University, Chikka Aluvara, Kodagu, India.
Talakatta K GirishDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Ananda DanagoudarDepartment of Studies and Research in Biochemistry, P.G Centre, Mangalore University, Chikka Aluvara, Kodagu, India.
Mangalore University · INUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore · INCentral Food Technological Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

objectiveThe objective of this evaluation of MATERIALS AND

methodsThe profiles of polyphenol and flavonoid were quantified through reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Free radical induced DNA and membrane damage were performed using H

resultsThe total polyphenol content of

conclusionThese findings suggest that SUMMARY: ROS are generated under normal biological systems. These ROS generated can be scavenged by endogenous and exogenous cellular mechanisms. Environmental stress, radiation, smoke etc. elevates ROS dramatically. This leads to significant damage to cellular biomolecules like DNA and cell structures. Plants as a large reservoir of drugs for protecting DNA and cell structures from oxidative stress. Polyphenols present in the

Indexed as

AntioxidantsCaesalpinia cristaDNA protectionfree radicalsmembrane damageoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID28808388
PMCPMC5538162
OpenAlexW2735083413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.