Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28808094›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Photosynthesis solutions to enhance productivity.

Christine H Foyer, Alexander V Ruban, Peter J Nixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Ratio of ARice (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Simulated Analysis of Influence of Changes in HPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Potassium (KAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christine H FoyerCentre of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK c.foyer@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5989-6989
Alexander V RubanSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8554-0249
Peter J NixonFaculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College, South Kensington Campus, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1952-6937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept that photosynthesis is a highly inefficient process in terms of conversion of light energy into biomass is embedded in the literature. It is only in the past decade that the processes limiting photosynthetic efficiency have been understood to an extent that allows a step change in our ability to manipulate light energy assimilation into carbon gain. We can therefore envisage that future increases in the grain yield potential of our major crops may depend largely on increasing the efficiency of photosynthesis. The papers in this issue provide new insights into the nature of current limitations on photosynthesis and identify new targets that can be used for crop improvement, together with information on the impacts of a changing environment on the productivity of photosynthesis on land and in our oceans.This article is part of the themed issue 'Enhancing photosynthesis in crop plants: targets for improvement'.

Indexed as

Crop ProductionPhotosynthesisCrops, AgriculturalCalvin–Benson cyclecrop improvementnon-photochemical quenchingphotosynthetic efficiencyphotosystem IIphytoplankton

Identifiers

PMID28808094
PMCPMC5566875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.