ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2017
Phylogenetic sequence analysis and functional studies reveal compensatory amino acid substitutions in loop 2 of human ribonucleotide reductase.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Still no Rest for the Reductases: Ribonucleotide Reductase (RNR) Structure and Function: An Update.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eukaryotic class I ribonucleotide reductases (RRs) generate deoxyribonucleotides for DNA synthesis. Binding of dNTP effectors is coupled to the formation of active dimers and induces conformational changes in a short loop (loop 2) to regulate RR specificity among its nucleoside diphosphate substrates. Moreover, ATP and dATP bind at an additional allosteric site 40 Å away from loop 2 and thereby drive formation of activated or inactive hexamers, respectively. To better understand how dNTP binding influences specificity, activity, and oligomerization of human RR, we aligned >300 eukaryotic RR sequences to examine natural sequence variation in loop 2. We found that most amino acids in eukaryotic loop 2 were nearly invariant in this sample; however, two positions co-varied as nonconservative substitutions (N291G and P294K; human numbering). We also found that the individual N291G and P294K substitutions in human RR additively affect substrate specificity. The P294K substitution significantly impaired effector-induced oligomerization required for enzyme activity, and oligomerization was rescued in the N291G/P294K enzyme. None of the other mutants exhibited altered ATP-mediated hexamerization; however, certain combinations of loop 2 mutations and dNTP effectors perturbed ATP's role as an allosteric activator. Our results demonstrate that the observed compensatory covariation of amino acids in eukaryotic loop 2 is essential for its role in dNTP-induced dimerization. In contrast, defects in substrate specificity are not rescued in the double mutant, implying that functional sequence variation elsewhere in the protein is necessary. These findings yield insight into loop 2's roles in regulating RR specificity, allostery, and oligomerization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.