ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017
Genomic evidence reveals a radiation of placental mammals uninterrupted by the KPg boundary.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evolutionary Models for the Diversification of Placental Mammals Across the KPg Boundary.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Pooled it
- Brawn before bite in endemic Asian eutherian mammals after the end-Cretaceous extinction.eLife · 2026Article
- WASTER: Practical de novo Phylogenomics from Low-coverage Short Reads.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Estimating Genome-Wide Phylogenies Using Probabilistic Topic Modeling.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- Teasing apart the sources of phylogenetic tree discordance across three genomes in the oak family (Fagaceae).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- New fossils imply a deeper origin of modern birds in the Mesozoic.National science review · 2025Review
- Accurate, scalable, and fully automated inference of species trees from raw genome assemblies using ROADIES.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Comparative Phylogenetics Reveal Clade-specific Drivers of Recombination Rate Evolution Across Vertebrates.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Completing a molecular timetree of Afrotheria.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Phylogenomic approaches reveal a robust time-scale phylogeny of the Terminal Fusarium Clade.IMA fungus · 2024Article
- Two Notorious Nodes: A Critical Examination of Relaxed Molecular Clock Age Estimates of the Bilaterian Animals and Placental Mammals.Systematic biology · 2024Article
- The promise and pitfalls of synteny in phylogenomics.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Genomes, fossils, and the concurrent rise of modern birds and flowering plants in the Late Cretaceous.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Population genetic structure and historical demography of the population of forest elephants in Côte d'Ivoire.PloS one · 2024Article
- Phylogenomics reveals an almost perfect polytomy among the almost ungulates (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Geologically calibrated mammalian tree and its correlation with global events, including the emergence of humans.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Improved mammalian family phylogeny using gap-rare multiple sequence alignment: A timetree of extant placentals and marsupials.Zoological research · 2023Article
- Pangolin Genomes Offer Key Insights and Resources for the World's Most Trafficked Wild Mammals.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- A genomic timescale for placental mammal evolution.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- The species coalescent indicates possible bat and pangolin origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2023Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timing of the diversification of placental mammals relative to the Cretaceous-Paleogene (KPg) boundary mass extinction remains highly controversial. In particular, there have been seemingly irreconcilable differences in the dating of the early placental radiation not only between fossil-based and molecular datasets but also among molecular datasets. To help resolve this discrepancy, we performed genome-scale analyses using 4,388 loci from 90 taxa, including representatives of all extant placental orders and transcriptome data from flying lemurs (Dermoptera) and pangolins (Pholidota). Depending on the gene partitioning scheme, molecular clock model, and genic deviation from molecular clock assumptions, extensive sensitivity analyses recovered widely varying diversification scenarios for placental mammals from a given gene set, ranging from a deep Cretaceous origin and diversification to a scenario spanning the KPg boundary, suggesting that the use of suboptimal molecular clock markers and methodologies is a major cause of controversies regarding placental diversification timing. We demonstrate that reconciliation between molecular and paleontological estimates of placental divergence times can be achieved using the appropriate clock model and gene partitioning scheme while accounting for the degree to which individual genes violate molecular clock assumptions. A birth-death-shift analysis suggests that placental mammals underwent a continuous radiation across the KPg boundary without apparent interruption by the mass extinction, paralleling a genus-level radiation of multituberculates and ecomorphological diversification of both multituberculates and therians. These findings suggest that the KPg catastrophe evidently played a limited role in placental diversification, which, instead, was likely a delayed response to the slightly earlier radiation of angiosperms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.