ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017
A genome Tree of Life for the Fungi kingdom.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Chromosome level de Novo hybrid assembly of Asian honeybee, Apis cerana Koreana.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evolutionary History and Distribution Analysis of Rhamnosyltransferases in the Fungal Kingdom.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of a novel family of antifungal agents based on a quinone methide oxime framework.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An alignment-free method for phylogeny estimation using maximum likelihood.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Whole-genome based phylogeny and comparative genomics of Sporidiobolales and related taxa ofIMA fungus · 2025Article
- Article
- Evolution of fungal tuberculosis necrotizing toxin (TNT) domain-containing enzymes reveals divergent adaptations to enhance NAD cleavage.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- First Report of the Emerging PathogenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal three new plant pathogenic fungi species (Septobasidiales, Basidiomycota) from China.MycoKeys · 2024Article
- Bioinformatics study of phytase from Aspergillus niger for use as feed additive in livestock feed.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Comparative genomic analysis of alloherpesviruses: Exploring an available genus/species demarcation proposal and method.Virus research · 2023Article
- Patterns and determinants of the global herbivorous mycobiome.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The Role of Yeasts in Human Health: A Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Natural Products from Chilean and Antarctic Marine Fungi and Their Biomedical Relevance.Marine drugs · 2023Review
- Reference-Based RADseq Unravels the Evolutionary History of Polar Species in 'the Crux Lichenologorum' GenusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diversity and Biosynthetic Potential of Fungi Isolated from St. John's Island, Singapore.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Editorial: Genomic and evolutionary analysis of microsporidian parasites.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Exploring the expressiveness of abstract metabolic networks.PloS one · 2023Article
- Pathogenesis and virulence ofVirulence · 2022Review
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungi belong to one of the largest and most diverse kingdoms of living organisms. The evolutionary kinship within a fungal population has so far been inferred mostly from the gene-information-based trees ("gene trees"), constructed commonly based on the degree of differences of proteins or DNA sequences of a small number of highly conserved genes common among the population by a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) method. Since each gene evolves under different evolutionary pressure and time scale, it has been known that one gene tree for a population may differ from other gene trees for the same population depending on the subjective selection of the genes. Within the last decade, a large number of whole-genome sequences of fungi have become publicly available, which represent, at present, the most fundamental and complete information about each fungal organism. This presents an opportunity to infer kinship among fungi using a whole-genome information-based tree ("genome tree"). The method we used allows comparison of whole-genome information without MSA, and is a variation of a computational algorithm developed to find semantic similarities or plagiarism in two books, where we represent whole-genomic information of an organism as a book of words without spaces. The genome tree reveals several significant and notable differences from the gene trees, and these differences invoke new discussions about alternative narratives for the evolution of some of the currently accepted fungal groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.