ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017
Adaptive benefit of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation in deaf adults.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in the Study of Speech and Language Impairment Across the Life Span: A Systematic Review.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Pooled it
- Differential cross-modal functional plasticity in deaf individuals: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.iScience · 2026Article
- Visual cortical responses in age-related hearing loss show evidence for compensatory neuroplasticity.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Time course of visual plasticity following adult-onset deafness.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sensory Deprivation and the Brain: Neurobiological Mechanisms, Psychological Effects, and Clinical Implications.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Executive function and language: a behavioural and functional near-infrared spectroscopy study in 23 normally hearing children and one deaf child with cochlear implants.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Optimizing short-channel regression in fNIRS: an empirical evaluation with ecological audiovisual stimuli.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Linking brain activation to clinical outcomes: an fNIRS study in cochlear implant users and normal hearing individuals.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Shape of the hemodynamic response function in deaf infants eligible for cochlear implantation.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Nonverbal Communication Processing in Deaf Adults: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Vibrotactile speech cues are associated with enhanced auditory processing in middle and superior temporal gyri.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Preliminary evidence for enhanced auditory cortex activation and mental development after gene therapy in children with autosomal recessive deafness 9.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Visual Cortical Processing in Children with Early Bilateral Cochlear Implants: A VEP Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The impact of language context on inter-brain synchrony in bilingual families.Frontiers in cognition · 2025Article
- fNIRS Changes in the Middle Temporal and Occipital Cortices After a Cochlear Implant.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
- Speech outcomes in cochlear implant users depend on visual cross-modal cortical activity measured before or after implantation.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Cochlear implantation in adults with acquired single-sided deafness improves cortical processing and comprehension of speech presented to the non-implanted ears: a longitudinal EEG study.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Imaging the developing brain with near-infrared spectroscopy in cochlear implanted children.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It has been suggested that visual language is maladaptive for hearing restoration with a cochlear implant (CI) due to cross-modal recruitment of auditory brain regions. Rehabilitative guidelines therefore discourage the use of visual language. However, neuroscientific understanding of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation has been restricted due to incompatibility between established neuroimaging techniques and the surgically implanted electronic and magnetic components of the CI. As a solution to this problem, here we used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a noninvasive optical neuroimaging method that is fully compatible with a CI and safe for repeated testing. The aim of this study was to examine cross-modal activation of auditory brain regions by visual speech from before to after implantation and its relation to CI success. Using fNIRS, we examined activation of superior temporal cortex to visual speech in the same profoundly deaf adults both before and 6 mo after implantation. Patients' ability to understand auditory speech with their CI was also measured following 6 mo of CI use. Contrary to existing theory, the results demonstrate that increased cross-modal activation of auditory brain regions by visual speech from before to after implantation is associated with better speech understanding with a CI. Furthermore, activation of auditory cortex by visual and auditory speech developed in synchrony after implantation. Together these findings suggest that cross-modal plasticity by visual speech does not exert previously assumed maladaptive effects on CI success, but instead provides adaptive benefits to the restoration of hearing after implantation through an audiovisual mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.