Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28808014›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Adaptive benefit of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation in deaf adults.

Carly A Anderson, Ian M Wiggins, Pádraig T Kitterick, Douglas E H Hartley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carly A AndersonNational Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham NG1 5DU, United Kingdom; carly.anderson2@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0928-4145
Ian M WigginsNational Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham NG1 5DU, United Kingdom.
Pádraig T KitterickNational Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham NG1 5DU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8383-5318
Douglas E H HartleyNational Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham NG1 5DU, United Kingdom.
National Health Service · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been suggested that visual language is maladaptive for hearing restoration with a cochlear implant (CI) due to cross-modal recruitment of auditory brain regions. Rehabilitative guidelines therefore discourage the use of visual language. However, neuroscientific understanding of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation has been restricted due to incompatibility between established neuroimaging techniques and the surgically implanted electronic and magnetic components of the CI. As a solution to this problem, here we used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a noninvasive optical neuroimaging method that is fully compatible with a CI and safe for repeated testing. The aim of this study was to examine cross-modal activation of auditory brain regions by visual speech from before to after implantation and its relation to CI success. Using fNIRS, we examined activation of superior temporal cortex to visual speech in the same profoundly deaf adults both before and 6 mo after implantation. Patients' ability to understand auditory speech with their CI was also measured following 6 mo of CI use. Contrary to existing theory, the results demonstrate that increased cross-modal activation of auditory brain regions by visual speech from before to after implantation is associated with better speech understanding with a CI. Furthermore, activation of auditory cortex by visual and auditory speech developed in synchrony after implantation. Together these findings suggest that cross-modal plasticity by visual speech does not exert previously assumed maladaptive effects on CI success, but instead provides adaptive benefits to the restoration of hearing after implantation through an audiovisual mechanism.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalCochlear ImplantationAgedAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionCase-Control StudiesHumansLanguageMiddle AgedVisual Perceptioncochlear implantationcross-modal plasticityfunctional near-infrared spectroscopysuperior temporal cortexvisual speech

Identifiers

PMID28808014
PMCPMC5617272
OpenAlexW2747460515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.