Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28807050›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2017

Cooperative binding mitigates the high-dose hook effect.

Ranjita Dutta Roy, Christian Rosenmund, Melanie I Stefan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Bifunctional Peptide Nanofibrils for Targeted Protein Degradation.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The androgen receptor-targeted proteolysis targeting chimera and other alternative therapeutic choices in overcoming the resistance to androgen deprivation treatment in prostate cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A Comparison of Murine PD-1 and PD-L1 Monoclonal Antibodies.Monoclonal antibodies in immunodiagnosis and immunotherapy · 2022
    Article
  15. PROTACs: past, present and future.Chemical Society reviews · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Discovery of a Potent Degrader for Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1/2.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Ranjita Dutta RoyDepartment of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christian RosenmundNWFZ, Charité Crossover, Charite Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Melanie I StefanDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. melanie.stefan@exseed.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-7357
Babraham Institute · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high-dose hook effect (also called prozone effect) refers to the observation that if a multivalent protein acts as a linker between two parts of a protein complex, then increasing the amount of linker protein in the mixture does not always increase the amount of fully formed complex. On the contrary, at a high enough concentration range the amount of fully formed complex actually decreases. It has been observed that allosterically regulated proteins seem less susceptible to this effect. The aim of this study was two-fold: First, to investigate the mathematical basis of how allostery mitigates the prozone effect. And second, to explore the consequences of allostery and the high-dose hook effect using the example of calmodulin, a calcium-sensing protein that regulates the switch between long-term potentiation and long-term depression in neurons.

resultsWe use a combinatorial model of a "perfect linker protein" (with infinite binding affinity) to mathematically describe the hook effect and its behaviour under allosteric conditions. We show that allosteric regulation does indeed mitigate the high-dose hook effect. We then turn to calmodulin as a real-life example of an allosteric protein. Using kinetic simulations, we show that calmodulin is indeed subject to a hook effect. We also show that this effect is stronger in the presence of the allosteric activator Ca

conclusionsWe show that cooperative binding can indeed act as a protective mechanism against the hook effect. This will have implications in vivo where the extent of cooperativity of a protein can be modulated, for instance, by allosteric activators or inhibitors. This can result in counterintuitive effects of decreased activity with increased concentrations of both the allosteric protein itself and its allosteric activators.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCalciumCalmodulinKineticsProtein BindingCalciumCalmodulinAllosteryCalmodulinCooperativityHigh-dose Hook effectMechanistic modelProzone effect

Identifiers

PMID28807050
PMCPMC5556679
OpenAlexW2949109587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.