Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28807045›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

A randomized, multi-center, prospective study comparing best medical treatment versus best medical treatment plus renal artery stenting in patients with hemodynamically relevant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RADAR) - one-year results of a pre-maturely terminated study.

Thomas Zeller, Hans Krankenberg, Andrejs Erglis, Erwin Blessing, Torsten Fuss, Dierk Scheinert, Ralf Weser, Beatrix B Doerr, Wilfrid D Yollo, Joerg Radermacher and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00640406 (A Randomized, Multi-centre, Prospective Study Comparing Best Medical Treatment Versus Best Medical Treatment Plus Renal Artery Stenting in Patients With Hemodynamically Relevant Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00640406 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Multi-centre, Prospective Study Comparing Best Medical Treatment Versus Best Medical Treatment Plus Renal Artery Stenting in Patients With Hemodynamically Relevant Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiotronik AGRan2008 to 2015Enrolled86ConditionsRenal Artery StenosisArmsDynamic Renal Stent plus Best Medical Treatment, Best Medical Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Contemporary Trends in Disparities for Renal Artery Stenting and Angioplasty in the United States.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021
    Article
  16. How should we define appropriate patients for percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty treatment?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas ZellerDepartment of Angiology, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Südring 15, 79189, Bad Krozingen, Germany. Thomas.Zeller@universitaets-herzzentrum.de.
Hans KrankenbergDepartment of Angiology, Asklepios Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Andrejs ErglisLatvian Center of Cardiology, P. Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Erwin BlessingDepartment of Internal Medicine, SRH Klinikum Karlsbad-Langensteinbach, Karlsbad, Germany.
Torsten FussZentralklinikum Suhl, Suhl, Germany.
Dierk ScheinertDepartment of Internal, Neurological and Dermatological Medicine, Division of Interventional Angiology, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipig, Germany.
Ralf WeserAbt. Kardiologie und Angiologie, Herzzentrum Coswig, Coswig, Anhalt, Germany.
Beatrix B DoerrCoriuvar Clinical Research & Medical Writing, Moosburg, Germany.
Wilfrid D YolloStatistical Programming Pool (S2P), Yaounde, Cameroon.
Joerg RadermacherCenter for Internal Medicine/Nephrology, Klinikum I, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Minden, Germany.
RADAR Investigators
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEJohannes Wesling Klinikum Minden · DESRH Klinikum Karlsbad-Langensteinbach · DEUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen · DEKlinik für Psychosomatik · DEPauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe indications for conservative "best medical treatment" (BMT) versus additional renal artery stenting are a matter of ongoing debate. The RADAR study aimed to evaluate the impact of percutaneous renal artery stenting on the impaired renal function in patients with hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS).

methodsRADAR is an international, prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled study comparing BMT alone versus BMT plus renal artery stenting in patients with duplex sonographic hemodynamically relevant RAS. Follow-up assessments were at 2, 6, and 12 months and at 3 years. The primary endpoint was change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months.

resultsDue to slow enrollment, RADAR was terminated early after inclusion of 86 of the scheduled 300 patients (28.7%). Change in eGFR between baseline and 12 months was 4.3 ± 15.4 ml/min/1.73 m

conclusionIn RADAR, outcomes of renal artery stenting were similar to BMT. These results have to be interpreted with the caveat that the study did not reach its statistically based sample size.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT00640406. Registered on 17 March 2008.

Indexed as

Early Termination of Clinical TrialsStentsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngioplasty, BalloonAntihypertensive AgentsAtherosclerosisBrazilEuropeFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHemodynamicsHumansHypertension, RenovascularMaleAntihypertensive AgentsBest medical therapyBest medical treatmentHypertensionRenal artery stenosisRenal artery stentingRenal function

Identifiers

PMID28807045
PMCPMC5556660
OpenAlexW2747564994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.