Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28807037›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2017

Selepressin, a novel selective vasopressin V

James A Russell, Jean-Louis Vincent, Anne Louise Kjølbye, Håkan Olsson, Allan Blemings, Herbert Spapen, Peder Carl, Pierre-Francois Laterre, Lars Grundemar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01000649 (Infusion Proof-of-concept Trial Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Ascending Doses of FE 202158 in Patients With Vasodilatory Hypotension in Early Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01000649 phase2completednot on this map

Infusion Proof-of-concept Trial Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Ascending Doses of FE 202158 in Patients With Vasodilatory Hypotension in Early Septic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorFerring PharmaceuticalsRan2009 to 2011Enrolled53ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsFE 202158 1.25, FE 202158 2.5, FE 202158 3.75, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Norepinephrine in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Vasopressor Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Food science & nutrition · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

James A RussellCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, Division of Critical Care Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada. jim.russell@hli.ubc.ca.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, ULB Erasme University Hospital (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Route de Lennik 808, B-1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Anne Louise KjølbyeFerring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Kay Fiskers Plads 11, DK-2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Håkan OlssonFerring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Kay Fiskers Plads 11, DK-2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Allan BlemingsFerring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Kay Fiskers Plads 11, DK-2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Herbert SpapenDienst Intensieve Geneeskunde, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Peder CarlAnaestesiology Department, Hvidovre Hospital, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Pierre-Francois LaterreClinique Universitaire St.-Luc, Service des Soins Intensifs, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Lars GrundemarFerring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Kay Fiskers Plads 11, DK-2300, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Denmark) · DKCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHvidovre Hospital · DKSt. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVasopressin is widely used for vasopressor support in septic shock patients, but experimental evidence suggests that selective V

methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial in 53 patients in early septic shock (aged ≥18 years, fluid resuscitation, requiring vasopressor support) who received selepressin 1.25 ng/kg/minute (n = 10), 2.5 ng/kg/minute (n = 19), 3.75 ng/kg/minute (n = 2), or placebo (n = 21) until shock resolution or a maximum of 7 days. If mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mmHg was not maintained, open-label norepinephrine was added. Co-primary endpoints were maintenance of MAP >60 mmHg without norepinephrine, norepinephrine dose, and proportion of patients maintaining MAP >60 mmHg with or without norepinephrine over 7 days. Secondary endpoints included cumulative fluid balance, organ dysfunction, pharmacokinetics, and safety.

resultsA higher proportion of the patients receiving 2.5 ng/kg/minute selepressin maintained MAP >60 mmHg without norepinephrine (about 50% and 70% at 12 and 24 h, respectively) vs. 1.25 ng/kg/minute selepressin and placebo (p < 0.01). The 7-day cumulative doses of norepinephrine were 761, 659, and 249 μg/kg (placebo 1.25 ng/kg/minute and 2.5 ng/kg/minute, respectively; 2.5 ng/kg/minute vs. placebo; p < 0.01). Norepinephrine infusion was weaned more rapidly in selepressin 2.5 ng/kg/minute vs. placebo (0.04 vs. 0.18 μg/kg/minute at 24 h, p < 0.001), successfully maintaining target MAP and reducing norepinephrine dose vs. placebo (first 24 h, p < 0.001). Cumulative net fluid balance was lower from day 5 onward in the selepressin 2.5 ng/kg/minute group vs. placebo (p < 0.05). The selepressin 2.5 ng/kg/minute group had a greater proportion of days alive and free of ventilation vs. placebo (p < 0.02). Selepressin (2.5 ng/kg/minute) was well tolerated, with a similar frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events for selepressin 2.5 ng/kg/minute and placebo. Two patients were infused at 3.75 ng/kg/minute, one of whom had the study drug infusion discontinued for possible safety reasons, with subsequent discontinuation of this dose group.

conclusionsIn septic shock patients, selepressin 2.5 ng/kg/minute was able to rapidly replace norepinephrine while maintaining adequate MAP, and it may improve fluid balance and shorten the time of mechanical ventilation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01000649 . Registered on September 30, 2009.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBelgiumChildDenmarkDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHypotensionMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrinePlacebosReceptors, VasopressinShock, SepticNorepinephrinePlacebosReceptors, VasopressinVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsFluid balanceMechanical ventilationNorepinephrineSelepressinSeptic shockV1A agonist

Identifiers

PMID28807037
PMCPMC5557574
OpenAlexW2749901817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.