Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28807027›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2017

Health-related quality of life in the Brazilian Amazon: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Marcus Tolentino Silva, Monica Caicedo Roa, Tais Freire Galvao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health-related quality of life assessment among people living with HIV in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcus Tolentino SilvaFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas, Rua Afonso Pena, 1053, Manaus, Amazonas, CEP: 69020-160, Brazil. marcusts@gmail.com.
Monica Caicedo RoaFaculty of Medicine, Clinical Research Institute, National University of Colombia, Calle 30 No. 45-03 Ciudad Universitaria, Bogotá, Colombia.
Tais Freire GalvaoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Cândido Portinari, 200, Cidade Universitária, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP: 13083-871, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo analyze perceptions of health-related quality of life and associated factors in populations from the Manaus Metropolitan Region.

methodsWe conducted a population-based cross-sectional study from May to August 2015. Adults aged 18 years and older were selected using probabilistic three-phase cluster sampling and stratified by sex and age, based on official estimates. Quality of life data were collected using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) along with socioeconomic, demographic, and health perception data. Utility scores were calculated using the Brazilian version of the EQ-5D-3L. Descriptive statistics were derived, and a multivariate Tobit regression model with correction for complex sampling was performed to identify the variables that influence utility levels.

resultsA total of 4001 participants were included. The average utility score was 0.886 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.881-0.890) with significant differences according to living area (the capital (0.882 ± 0.144) or inner cities (0.908 ± 0.122; p < 0.001)). The dimension for which the highest proportion of people reported moderate to severe problems was pain/discomfort (39%), followed by anxiety/depression (18%). Men had a higher quality of life than women (β = 0.041, p < 0.001). Not working was a factor that increased quality of life compared with being formally employed (β = 0.031, p = 0.037). The poorest people had a lower quality of life than the richest people (β = -0.118, p < 0.001). Better health perceptions increased utility scores (p < 0.001), while being separated decreased the scores (β = -0.052, p = 0.001).

conclusionHealth-related quality of life in the Manaus Metropolitan Region was high, as expected for the general population, and was higher among individuals who lived in the inner cities, men and those in higher social classes. Gender discrepancies and differences in quality of life between the capital and inner cities should be further investigated.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAnxietyBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPopulation SurveillanceSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban PopulationBrazilHealth behaviorHealth care surveysPatient preference, health statusQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID28807027
PMCPMC5556350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.